Formerly Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Cardiovascular Services, St. Vincent Hospital, 8333 Naab Road, Ste 400, Indianapolis, IN, 46260, USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Dec;4(6):1189-1194. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0325-x. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
We sought to quantify socioeconomic disparities in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) at an urban, tertiary referral center.
This retrospective case-control study identified 67 patients with severe AS (aortic valve [AV] area ≤1 cm or AV area index ≤0.60 cm/m or AV velocity ≥40 mmHg) who underwent TAVR from November 5, 2013 to June 10, 2014. Study subjects were matched to controls with severe AS without TAVR in a 4:1 age-frequency match. Demographic data were collected using electronic medical records. Area-based median household income was obtained by geocoding patients' addresses and linking with census data. Charlson comorbidity index for all subjects was calculated.
Income disparity was significant in that with every $10,000 increase in income, the odds of receiving TAVR increased by 10% (p = 0.05). Non-blacks were significantly more likely to receive TAVR than blacks (odds ratio [OR] 2.812, confidence interval [CI] 1.007-7.853; p = 0.048). No differences in comorbidities were found between the two groups. Post hoc analysis to identify etiologies of the found disparities examined differences of AV area and AV area index, indication for two-dimensional echocardiography (echo), symptoms prior to echo, and action after echo within the control group. Black race significantly impacted the TAVR status despite the same AV area (OR 0.33, CI 0.09-0.97, p = 0.043). After echo, blacks were more likely to decline AVR, be lost to follow-up, and not be referred to cardiology (OR 4.41, CI 1.43-13.64; p = 0.010).
Socioeconomic and racial disparities were associated with patients with severe AS receiving TAVR at a major referral center. This study emphasizes the importance of improving access to standard of care for these subgroups of cardiac patients.
我们旨在量化在城市三级转诊中心接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的社会经济差异。
本回顾性病例对照研究纳入了 67 名重度 AS 患者(主动脉瓣 [AV] 面积≤1cm 或 AV 面积指数≤0.60cm/m 或 AV 速度≥40mmHg),他们于 2013 年 11 月 5 日至 2014 年 6 月 10 日接受了 TAVR。研究对象与未接受 TAVR 的重度 AS 对照组以 4:1 的年龄频率匹配。使用电子病历收集人口统计学数据。通过对患者的地址进行地理编码,并与人口普查数据相链接,获得基于区域的家庭中位数收入。对所有受试者进行 Charlson 合并症指数计算。
收入差异显著,收入每增加 10,000 美元,接受 TAVR 的几率增加 10%(p=0.05)。非黑人接受 TAVR 的可能性明显高于黑人(优势比 [OR] 2.812,置信区间 [CI] 1.007-7.853;p=0.048)。两组之间的合并症无差异。为确定发现的差异的病因,我们进行了事后分析,以检查对照组中 AV 面积和 AV 面积指数、二维超声心动图(echo)的适应证、echo 前的症状以及 echo 后的行动的差异。尽管 AV 面积相同,但黑人种族仍显著影响 TAVR 状态(OR 0.33,CI 0.09-0.97,p=0.043)。接受 echo 后,黑人更有可能拒绝 AVR、失访且未转至心脏病科(OR 4.41,CI 1.43-13.64;p=0.010)。
在主要转诊中心,社会经济和种族差异与重度 AS 患者接受 TAVR 相关。本研究强调了改善这些亚组心脏患者获得标准护理的重要性。