Montejo Carrasco Pedro, Montenegro-Peña Mercedes, López-Higes Ramón, Estrada Eduardo, Prada Crespo David, Montejo Rubio Christian, García Azorín David
Centre for the Prevention of Cognitive Impairment. Madrid Salud. Madrid City Council, Spain.
Centre for the Prevention of Cognitive Impairment. Madrid Salud. Madrid City Council, Spain; Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 May-Jun;70:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
(i) To analyze if general cognitive performance, perceived health and depression are predictors of Subjective Memory Complaints (SMC) contrasting their effect sizes; (ii) to analyze the relationship between SMC and objective memory by comparing a test that measures memory in daily life and a classical test of associated pairs; (iii) to examine if different subgroups, formed according to the MFE score, might have different behaviors regarding the studied variables.
Sample: 3921 community-dwelling people (mean age 70.41±4.70) without cognitive impairment. Consecutive non-probabilistic recruitment.
Mini Cognitive Exam (MCE), daily memory Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT), Paired Associates Learning (PAL), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Dependent variable: Memory Failures Everyday Questionnaire (MFE).
Two different dimensions to explain SMC were found: One subjective (MFE, GDS, NHP) and other objective (RBMT, PAL, MCE), the first more strongly associated with SMC. SMC predictors were NHP, GDS, RBMT and PAL, in this order according to effect size. Considering MFE scores we subdivided the sample into three groups (low, medium, higher scores): low MFE group was associated with GDS; medium, with GDS, NPH and RBMT, and higher, with age as well. Effect size for every variable tended to grow as the MFE score was higher.
SMC were associated with both health profile and depressive symptoms and, in a lesser degree, with memory and overall cognitive performance. In people with fewer SMC, these are only associated with depressive symptomatology. More SMC are associated with depression, poor health perception and lower memory.
(i)分析一般认知能力、感知健康状况和抑郁是否为主观记忆障碍(SMC)的预测因素,并比较它们的效应大小;(ii)通过比较一项测量日常生活记忆的测试和一项经典的联想对测试,分析SMC与客观记忆之间的关系;(iii)研究根据记忆失败日常问卷(MFE)得分形成的不同亚组在研究变量方面是否具有不同行为。
样本:3921名无认知障碍的社区居民(平均年龄70.41±4.70岁)。连续非概率抽样。
简易认知检查(MCE)、日常记忆Rivermead行为记忆测试(RBMT)、联想学习(PAL)、老年抑郁量表(GDS)、诺丁汉健康概况(NHP)。因变量:记忆失败日常问卷(MFE)。
发现解释SMC的两个不同维度:一个是主观维度(MFE、GDS、NHP),另一个是客观维度(RBMT、PAL、MCE),前者与SMC的关联更强。根据效应大小,SMC的预测因素依次为NHP、GDS、RBMT和PAL。根据MFE得分将样本分为三组(低分、中分、高分):低MFE组与GDS相关;中分组与GDS、NPH和RBMT相关,高分组与年龄也相关。随着MFE得分升高,每个变量的效应大小趋于增大。
SMC与健康状况和抑郁症状均相关,与记忆和整体认知能力的相关性较小。在SMC较少的人群中,它们仅与抑郁症状相关。更多的SMC与抑郁、健康感知差和记忆能力低相关。