Wang Lu, Zhuang Yunyun, Zhang Huan, Lin Xin, Lin Senjie
Marine Biodiversity and Global Change Research Center and State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340, USA.
Harmful Algae. 2014 Jan;31:100-113. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
Alexandrium species can be very difficult to identify, with A. catenella, A. tamarense, and A. fundyense that compose "Alexandrium tamarense species complex" (Atama complex) as a distinct example. DNA barcoding is promising to offer a solution but remains to be established. In this study, we examined the utility of ITS in resolving the Atama species complex, by analyzing previously studied strains plus unstudied Chinese strains within the LSU- and SSU-rDNA based group/clade frameworks recently established. We further investigated the presence of intragenomic polymorphism and its implications in species delimitation. Similar to the previous SSU and LSU results, our ITS-based phylogenies divided the complex to five clusters, but with longer and evener branch lengths between the clusters. Based on the ITS region, the inter-cluster genetic distances (p=0.134-0.216) were consistently and substantially greater than intra-cluster genetic distances (p=0.000-0.066), with an average inter-cluster (species) distance (p=0.167) 7.6-fold of the average intraspecific difference (p=0.022), qualifying the approximately 510-520bp ITS as a DNA barcode for Atama complex. We detected varying levels of intragenomic polymorphism in ITS but found that this did not impact the taxon-resolving power of this gene. With this DNA barcode, the new East and South China Sea strains and one Antarctic strain were placed in Clade IIC/Group IV, even though there were 7-10 polymorphic sites in their ITS, in contrast to none in SSU. Furthermore, our results suggest that the five clusters are recognizable as distinct species according to the phylogenetic species concept. Based on the phylogenetic placements of the type-locality strains of the existing three morphospecies and the dominant localities of other strains, we propose that Group I/Clade I be designated as A. fundyense, Group III/Clade IIB as A. tamarense, Group IV/Clade IIC as A. catenella, Group II/Clade IIA as A. mediterranis, and Group V/Clade IID as A. australis.
亚历山大藻属物种很难鉴定,以构成“塔玛亚历山大藻物种复合体”(Atama复合体)的链状亚历山大藻、塔玛亚历山大藻和芬迪湾亚历山大藻为例。DNA条形码技术有望提供一种解决方案,但仍有待确立。在本研究中,我们通过分析先前研究过的菌株以及最近在基于 LSU 和 SSU-rDNA 的类群/进化枝框架内未研究过的中国菌株,研究了 ITS 在解析 Atama 物种复合体中的效用。我们进一步研究了基因组内多态性的存在及其在物种界定中的意义。与之前基于 SSU 和 LSU 的结果相似,我们基于 ITS 的系统发育将该复合体分为五个簇,但簇间的分支长度更长且更均匀。基于 ITS 区域,簇间遗传距离(p = 0.134 - 0.216)始终且显著大于簇内遗传距离(p = 0.000 - 0.066),平均簇间(物种)距离(p = 0.167)是平均种内差异(p = 0.022)的 7.6 倍,这使得约 510 - 520bp 的 ITS 有资格作为 Atama 复合体的 DNA 条形码。我们在 ITS 中检测到不同水平的基因组内多态性,但发现这并未影响该基因的分类解析能力。利用这个 DNA 条形码,新的中国东海和南海菌株以及一株南极菌株被归入进化枝 IIC/类群 IV,尽管它们的 ITS 中有 7 - 10 个多态性位点,而 SSU 中没有。此外,我们的结果表明,根据系统发育物种概念,这五个簇可被识别为不同的物种。基于现有三个形态种的模式产地菌株的系统发育位置以及其他菌株的主要产地,我们建议将类群 I/进化枝 I 定为芬迪湾亚历山大藻,类群 III/进化枝 IIB 定为塔玛亚历山大藻,类群 IV/进化枝 IIC 定为链状亚历山大藻,类群 II/进化枝 IIA 定为地中海亚历山大藻,类群 V/进化枝 IID 定为澳大利亚亚历山大藻。