Suppr超能文献

白内障手术所致散光的分析:两种偏振方法的比较

Analysis of cataract surgery induced astigmatism: Two polar methods comparison.

作者信息

García-López Veronica, García-López Claudia, de Juan Victoria, Martin Raul

机构信息

Universidad de Valladolid, Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (IOBA), Paseo de Belén, 17 - Campus Miguel Delibes, 47011 Valladolid, Spain; Optometry Research Group, IOBA Eye Institute, School of Optometry, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Optometry Research Group, IOBA Eye Institute, School of Optometry, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain; Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Optom. 2017 Oct-Dec;10(4):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) caused by the incision after cataract surgery may be calculated to improve IOL toric power calculation and achieve better visual outcome. SIA could be determined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometry expressed in polar values using different equations. The objective of this study is to compare the SIA calculated with two different polar value analysis methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) developed to be used with incisions placed at 90° and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45) developed to be used independently of the incision location].

METHODS

Preoperative and one month postoperative data of 210 cataractous eyes (131 patients) undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery were assessed. All incisions were performed at 11 o'clock (120°). No sutures were used in any patient. IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, Ireland) keratometry was used to polar calculation.

RESULTS

The average age was 66.25±12.33 years (range 22-89). SIA polar value data calculated with Method #1 were KP (90) -0.06±0.52D and KP (135) +0.05±0.91D and calculated with Method #2 were AKP -0.10±0.87D and AKP (+45) +0.02±0.02D. However, SIA value represented in traditional notation (diopters@axis in degrees) was the same value independently of the method used to calculate; +0.65@110.70°.

CONCLUSION

SIA value is independent of the polar method used to its calculation and slight variations in the incision position could be accepted without clinical relevant impact in SIA magnitude. Both methods [Method #1: KP (90)/KP (135) and Method #2: AKP/AKP (+45)] are useful to calculate SIA with superior incisions at 120°.

摘要

目的

白内障手术后切口引起的手术性散光(SIA)可用于计算,以改进人工晶状体(IOL)散光度数的计算并获得更好的视觉效果。SIA可通过使用不同公式将术前和术后角膜曲率计测量值的极坐标值差异来确定。本研究的目的是比较用两种不同极坐标值分析方法计算的SIA[方法1:KP(90)/KP(135),用于90°切口;方法2:AKP/AKP(+45),可独立于切口位置使用]。

方法

评估了210只接受单纯白内障手术的白内障患眼(131例患者)术前及术后1个月的数据。所有切口均在11点(120°)进行。所有患者均未使用缝线。使用IOLMaster(德国卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司,都柏林,爱尔兰)角膜曲率计进行极坐标计算。

结果

平均年龄为66.25±12.33岁(范围22 - 89岁)。用方法1计算的SIA极坐标值数据为KP(90) -0.06±0.52D和KP(135) +0.05±0.91D,用方法2计算的为AKP -0.10±0.87D和AKP(+45) +0.02±0.02D。然而,以传统表示法(屈光度@轴位度数)表示的SIA值,无论使用何种计算方法,均为同一值;+0.65@110.70°。

结论

SIA值与用于计算的极坐标方法无关,切口位置的微小变化在临床上对SIA大小无相关影响,可被接受。两种方法[方法1:KP(90)/KP(135)和方法2:AKP/AKP(+45)]均适用于计算120°上方切口的SIA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/5595260/57fb63740ada/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验