Herber Oliver Rudolf, Smith Karen, White Myra, Jones Martyn C
School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Institute of General Practice (ifam), Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Nov;26(21-22):3529-3542. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13722. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
To explore what reasons do nonattenders and noncompleters give for their patterns of participation or nonparticipation in cardiac rehabilitation programmes and how future uptake could be enhanced.
Cardiac rehabilitation is a cost-effective clinical intervention designed for adults with acute coronary syndrome. Despite evidence from meta-analyses demonstrating that cardiac rehabilitation programmes facilitate physical and psychological recovery from acute coronary syndrome, only 20-50% of eligible patients attend Phase III outpatient programmes.
A qualitative study using thematic analysis.
Within the context of a larger mixed-method study, acute coronary syndrome patients were recruited between 2012-2014 from three hospitals in Scotland. Of 214 patients who consented to enrol in the main study, a purposive subsample of 25 participants was recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis.
Three major influences of participation were identified: (1) personal factors, (2) programme factors and (3) practical factors. In addition, valuable suggestions for future programme modifications were provided. A significant barrier to attending cardiac rehabilitation programmes is that participants perceived themselves to be unsuitable for the programme alongside a lack of knowledge and/or misconceptions regarding cardiac rehabilitation.
The responses of nonattenders and noncompleters revealed misconceptions related to programme suitability, the intensity of exercise required and the purpose of a cardiac rehabilitation programme. As long as these misconceptions continue to persist in coronary syndrome patients, this will impact upon attendance. The lack of perceived need for cardiac rehabilitation stems from a poor understanding of the programme, especially among nonattenders and noncompleters and subsequently an inability to comprehend possible benefits.
The knowledge of common misconceptions puts clinical nurses in a better position to identify and pro-actively address these erroneous assumptions in their patients in order to improve participation in cardiac rehabilitation.
探究未参加者和未完成者对于其参与或不参与心脏康复项目模式给出的原因,以及如何提高未来的参与率。
心脏康复是一项为急性冠状动脉综合征成人患者设计的具有成本效益的临床干预措施。尽管荟萃分析的证据表明心脏康复项目有助于急性冠状动脉综合征患者的身体和心理恢复,但只有20%-50%的符合条件的患者参加第三阶段门诊项目。
一项采用主题分析的定性研究。
在一项更大规模的混合方法研究背景下,2012年至2014年期间从苏格兰的三家医院招募急性冠状动脉综合征患者。在214名同意参加主要研究的患者中,选取了25名参与者作为有目的的子样本。进行了半结构化访谈,并采用主题分析进行分析。
确定了参与的三个主要影响因素:(1)个人因素,(2)项目因素和(3)实际因素。此外,还为未来项目的修改提供了有价值的建议。参加心脏康复项目的一个重大障碍是,参与者认为自己不适合该项目,同时对心脏康复缺乏了解和/或存在误解。
未参加者和未完成者的回答揭示了与项目适用性、所需运动强度以及心脏康复项目目的相关的误解。只要这些误解在冠状动脉综合征患者中持续存在,就会影响参与率。对心脏康复缺乏感知需求源于对该项目的理解不足,尤其是在未参加者和未完成者中,随后无法理解可能的益处。
了解常见误解使临床护士能够更好地识别并主动纠正患者的这些错误假设,以提高心脏康复的参与率。