Gallione Chiara, Dal Molin Alberto, Cristina Fabio V B, Ferns Hilary, Mattioli Mark, Suardi Barbara
Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara/"Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont - Coordinator of Nursing School, Biella Hospital, Biella, Italy.
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Aug;26(15-16):2154-2176. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13721. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
To review the efficacy and accuracy of tools administered to older people, intended to detect and measure elder abuse.
The mistreatment of older people represents a widespread problem, with exponential growth risk, especially considering the progressive ageing of the world population. It could have serious consequences for the victim's health if not recognised early, denounced and stopped. Abuse is often undetected by service providers because there is a lack of awareness surrounding the magnitude of the problem. Education and formal training in the signs of abuse are also generally poorly developed, as are reporting procedures which would lead to further investigation.
Systematic review.
Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE and Scopus were undertaken. Screening of 695 articles resulted in 11 included. Appraisal and analysis using PRISMA Statement and STROBE checklist were undertaken.
Eleven screening tools have been presented: H-S/EAST, VASS, EASI, CASE, BASE, E-IOA, EAI, EPAS, CPEABS, OAPAM and OAFEM, all aimed at healthcare professional or, in some cases, expected to be specifically used by nurses.
The fundamental function of any assessment instrument is to guide through a standardised screening process and to ensure that signs of abuse are not missed. Several tools have been tested; some have demonstrated a moderate to good internal consistency and some have been validated to allow an early identification. None have been evaluated against measurable violence or health outcomes.
Nurses and all healthcare providers should screen patients routinely. However, we are not able to recommend a single tool as the selection and implementation has to be appropriate to the setting. Furthermore, the study population and the possibility of using multiple tools in combination should be taken into consideration, to assess all the aspects of violence.
回顾用于老年人的、旨在检测和衡量虐待老人情况的工具的有效性和准确性。
虐待老年人是一个普遍存在的问题,且有呈指数级增长的风险,尤其是考虑到世界人口的不断老龄化。如果不及早发现、举报并制止,可能会给受害者的健康带来严重后果。服务提供者往往未能察觉虐待行为,因为对该问题的严重程度缺乏认识。关于虐待迹象的教育和正规培训普遍也很欠缺,举报程序亦是如此,而这些程序本可引发进一步调查。
系统评价。
对MEDLINE、Cochrane、EMBASE和Scopus数据库进行全面检索。对695篇文章进行筛选,最终纳入11篇。使用PRISMA声明和STROBE清单进行评估与分析。
共介绍了11种筛查工具:H-S/EAST、VASS、EASI、CASE、BASE、E-IOA、EAI、EPAS、CPEABS、OAPAM和OAFEM,所有这些工具均针对医疗保健专业人员,在某些情况下,预计由护士专门使用。
任何评估工具的基本功能都是通过标准化筛查过程提供指导,并确保不遗漏虐待迹象。已经对几种工具进行了测试;一些工具显示出中等至良好的内部一致性,一些工具已经过验证可用于早期识别。但尚无工具针对可衡量的暴力行为或健康结果进行评估。
护士和所有医疗服务提供者应定期对患者进行筛查。然而,我们无法推荐单一工具,因为工具的选择和实施必须适合具体情况。此外,应考虑研究人群以及联合使用多种工具的可能性,以评估暴力行为的所有方面。