Steele James, Fisher James, Giessing Jürgen, Gentil Paulo
Centre for Health, Exercise, and Sport Science, School of Sport, Health and Social Sciences, Southampton Solent University, East Park Terrace, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 0YN, UK.
Institute of Sport Science, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Sep;56(3):368-374. doi: 10.1002/mus.25557. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
Previous resistance training (RT) recommendations and position stands have addressed variables that can be manipulated when producing RT interventions. However, 1 variable that has received little discussion is set endpoints (i.e., the endpoint of a set of repetitions). Set endpoints in RT are often considered to be proximity to momentary failure and are thought to be a primary variable determining effort in RT. Further, there has been ambiguity in the use and definition of terminology that has created issues in interpretation of research findings. The purpose of this paper was to: (1) provide an overview of the ambiguity in historical terminology around set endpoints; (2) propose a clearer set of definitions related to set endpoints; and (3) highlight the issues created by poor terminology and definitions. It is hoped this may permit greater clarity in reporting, interpretation, and application of RT interventions for researchers and practitioners. Muscle Nerve 56: 368-374, 2017.
以往的阻力训练(RT)建议和立场声明涉及了在制定RT干预措施时可操控的变量。然而,一个很少被讨论的变量是组终点(即一组重复动作的终点)。RT中的组终点通常被认为是接近瞬间疲劳,并且被视为决定RT训练强度的主要变量。此外,术语的使用和定义存在模糊性,这给研究结果的解释带来了问题。本文的目的是:(1)概述围绕组终点的历史术语中的模糊性;(2)提出一套与组终点相关的更清晰的定义;(3)强调术语和定义不当所产生的问题。希望这可以使研究人员和从业者在报告、解释和应用RT干预措施时更加清晰明了。《肌肉与神经》56: 368 - 374, 2017年。