David O'Connor, Ronald M.R. Tan, Jack Bartram, and Sujith Samarasinghe, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust; Rachael Hough, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London; Anthony V. Moorman, Claire Schwab, and Christine J. Harrison, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne; Rachel Wade, University of Oxford, Oxford; Jeremy Hancock, North Bristol NHS Trust; John Moppett, Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol; Ajay Vora and Katharine Patrick, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom; and Nick Goulden, Trapehade, Monferran Plaves, France.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):660-667. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.6278. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
Purpose Our aim was to determine the role of end-of-induction (EOI) minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in the identification and stratification of induction failure in patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and to identify genetic abnormalities that drive disease in these patients. Patients and Methods Analysis included 3,113 patients who were treated in the Medical Research Council UKALL2003 multicenter randomized trial (NCT00222612) between 2003 and 2011. MRD was measured by using standardized real-time quantitative PCR. Median follow-up was 5 years 9 months. Results Fifty-nine patients (1.9%) had morphologic induction failure with 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 50.7% (95% CI, 37.4 to 64.0) and 5-year overall survival of 57.7% (95% CI, 44.2 to 71.2). Of these, a small proportion of patients with M2 marrow (6 of 44) and a low EOI MRD level (< 0.01%) had 5-year EFS of 100%. Conversely, among patients with morphologic remission 2.3% (61 of 2,633) had high MRD (≥ 5%) and 5-year EFS of 47.0% (95% CI, 32.9 to 61.1), which was similar to those with morphologic induction failure. Redefining induction failure to include morphologic induction failure and/or MRD ≥ 5% identified 3.9% (120 of 3,133 patients) of the trial cohort with 5-year EFS of 48.0% (95% CI, 39.3 to 58.6). Induction failure (morphologic or MRD ≥ 5%) occurred most frequently in T-ALL (10.1%; 39 of 386 T-ALL cases) and B-other ALL, that is, lacking established chromosomal abnormalities (5.6%; 43 of 772 B-other cases). Genetic testing within the B-other group revealed the presence of PDGFRB gene fusions, particularly EBF1-PDGFRB, in almost one third of B-other ALL cases. Conclusion Integration of EOI MRD level with morphology identifies induction failure more precisely than morphology alone. Prevalence of EBF1-PDGFRB fusions in this group highlights the importance of genetic screening to identify abnormalities that may be targets for novel agents.
本研究旨在确定诱导结束时(EOI)微小残留病(MRD)评估在识别和分层儿科急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)诱导失败患者中的作用,并确定导致这些患者疾病的遗传异常。
分析纳入了 3113 名于 2003 年至 2011 年期间在英国医学研究理事会 UKALL2003 多中心随机试验(NCT00222612)中接受治疗的患者。采用标准化实时定量 PCR 检测 MRD。中位随访时间为 5 年 9 个月。
59 例(1.9%)患者存在形态学诱导失败,5 年无事件生存率(EFS)为 50.7%(95%CI,37.4 至 64.0),5 年总生存率为 57.7%(95%CI,44.2 至 71.2)。其中,一小部分骨髓形态为 M2(44 例中的 6 例)和 EOI MRD 水平较低(<0.01%)的患者 5 年 EFS 为 100%。相反,在形态学缓解的患者中,2.3%(2633 例中的 61 例)MRD 较高(≥5%),5 年 EFS 为 47.0%(95%CI,32.9 至 61.1),与形态学诱导失败患者相似。将诱导失败重新定义为包括形态学诱导失败和/或 MRD≥5%,则可识别出 3.9%(3133 例患者中的 120 例)的试验队列,其 5 年 EFS 为 48.0%(95%CI,39.3 至 58.6)。诱导失败(形态学或 MRD≥5%)最常发生在 T-ALL(386 例 T-ALL 病例中的 10.1%,39 例)和缺乏明确染色体异常的 B-其他 ALL(772 例 B-其他病例中的 5.6%,43 例)。在 B-其他组中进行的基因检测显示,几乎三分之一的 B-其他 ALL 病例存在 EBF1-PDGFRB 融合,特别是 EBF1-PDGFRB。
EOI MRD 水平与形态学相结合,比单纯形态学更能准确地识别诱导失败。该组中 EBF1-PDGFRB 融合的出现突出了基因筛查的重要性,以确定可能成为新型药物靶点的异常。