Cavelti M, Wirtz M, Corrigan P, Vauth R
Translational research center, university hospital of psychiatry and psychotherapy, university of Bern, 111, Bolligenstrasse, 3000 Bern 60, Switzerland; Orygen, The National centre of excellence in youth mental health, centre for youth mental health, the university of Melbourne, 35, Poplar road, VIC 3052 Parkville, Australia.
University of education Freiburg, 21, Kunzenweg, 79117 Freiburg, Germany.
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;41:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
The recovery framework has found its way into local and national mental health services and policies around the world, especially in English speaking countries. To promote this process, it is necessary to assess personal recovery validly and reliably. The Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) is the most established measure in recovery research. The aim of the current study is to examine the factor structure of the German version of the RAS (RAS-G).
One hundred and fifty-six German-speaking clients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from a community mental health service completed the RAS-G plus measures of recovery attitudes, self-stigma, psychotic symptoms, depression, and functioning. A confirmatory factor analysis of the original 24-item RAS version was conducted to examine its factor structure, followed by reliability and validity testing of the extracted factors.
The CFA yielded five factors capturing 14 items which showed a substantial overlap with the original subscales Personal Confidence and Hope, Goal and Success Orientation, Willingness to Ask for Help, Reliance on Others, and No Domination by Symptoms. The factors demonstrated mean to excellent reliability (0.59-0.89) and satisfactory criterial validity by positive correlations with measures of recovery attitudes and functioning, and negative correlations with measures of self-stigma, and psychotic and depressive symptoms.
The study results are discussed in the light of other studies examining the factor structure of the RAS. Overall, they support the use of the RAS-G as a means to promote recovery oriented services, policies, and research in German-speaking countries.
康复框架已融入世界各地的地方和国家心理健康服务及政策中,尤其是在英语国家。为推动这一进程,有必要有效且可靠地评估个人康复情况。康复评估量表(RAS)是康复研究中最成熟的测量工具。本研究的目的是检验德语版RAS(RAS-G)的因子结构。
来自社区心理健康服务机构的156名讲德语的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者完成了RAS-G以及康复态度、自我污名、精神病症状、抑郁和功能的测量。对原始的24项RAS版本进行验证性因子分析以检验其因子结构,随后对提取的因子进行信效度检验。
验证性因子分析得出五个因子,涵盖14个项目,这些项目与原始子量表个人信心与希望、目标与成功导向、求助意愿、对他人的依赖以及不受症状支配有很大重叠。这些因子的信度从一般到优秀(0.59 - 0.89),通过与康复态度和功能测量指标的正相关以及与自我污名、精神病和抑郁症状测量指标的负相关,显示出令人满意的效标效度。
根据其他检验RAS因子结构的研究对本研究结果进行了讨论。总体而言,这些结果支持将RAS-G用作在讲德语国家促进以康复为导向的服务、政策和研究的一种手段。