Suppr超能文献

塞内加尔凯杜古地区非恶性疟原虫疟疾感染的证据。

Evidence of non-Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection in Kédougou, Sénégal.

作者信息

Daniels Rachel F, Deme Awa Bineta, Gomis Jules F, Dieye Baba, Durfee Katelyn, Thwing Julie I, Fall Fatou B, Ba Mady, Ndiop Medoune, Badiane Aida S, Ndiaye Yaye Die, Wirth Dyann F, Volkman Sarah K, Ndiaye Daouda

机构信息

Department of Immunology and Infectious Disease, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Infectious Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Malar J. 2017 Jan 3;16(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1661-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Expanded malaria control efforts in Sénégal have resulted in increased use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) to identify the primary disease-causing Plasmodium species, Plasmodium falciparum. However, the type of RDT utilized in Sénégal does not detect other malaria-causing species such as Plasmodium ovale spp., Plasmodium malariae, or Plasmodium vivax. Consequently, there is a lack of information about the frequency and types of malaria infections occurring in Sénégal. This study set out to better determine whether species other than P. falciparum were evident among patients evaluated for possible malaria infection in Kédougou, Sénégal.

METHODS

Real-time polymerase chain reaction speciation assays for P. vivax, P. ovale spp., and P. malariae were developed and validated by sequencing and DNA extracted from 475 Plasmodium falciparum-specific HRP2-based RDT collected between 2013 and 2014 from a facility-based sample of symptomatic patients from two health clinics in Kédougou, a hyper-endemic region in southeastern Sénégal, were analysed.

RESULTS

Plasmodium malariae (n = 3) and P. ovale wallikeri (n = 2) were observed as co-infections with P. falciparum among patients with positive RDT results (n = 187), including one patient positive for all three species. Among 288 negative RDT samples, samples positive for P. falciparum (n = 24), P. ovale curtisi (n = 3), P. ovale wallikeri (n = 1), and P. malariae (n = 3) were identified, corresponding to a non-falciparum positivity rate of 2.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasize the limitations of the RDT used for malaria diagnosis and demonstrate that non-P. falciparum malaria infections occur in Sénégal. Current RDT used for routine clinical diagnosis do not necessarily provide an accurate reflection of malaria transmission in Kédougou, Sénégal, and more sensitive and specific methods are required for diagnosis and patient care, as well as surveillance and elimination activities. These findings have implications for other malaria endemic settings where species besides P. falciparum may be transmitted and overlooked by control or elimination activities.

摘要

背景

塞内加尔加强了疟疾防控工作,这使得快速诊断检测(RDT)在识别主要致病疟原虫物种——恶性疟原虫方面的使用有所增加。然而,塞内加尔使用的RDT类型无法检测其他致病疟原虫物种,如卵形疟原虫、三日疟原虫或间日疟原虫。因此,塞内加尔缺乏关于疟疾感染频率和类型的信息。本研究旨在更好地确定在塞内加尔凯杜古接受疟疾感染可能性评估的患者中,除恶性疟原虫外的其他物种是否明显存在。

方法

开发并验证了用于间日疟原虫、卵形疟原虫和三日疟原虫的实时聚合酶链反应物种鉴定分析方法,通过测序和从2013年至2014年期间从塞内加尔东南部高度流行地区凯杜古的两家卫生诊所的有症状患者的设施样本中收集的475份基于恶性疟原虫特异性HRP2的RDT中提取的DNA进行分析。

结果

在RDT结果呈阳性的患者(n = 187)中,观察到三日疟原虫(n = 3)和沃氏卵形疟原虫(n = 2)与恶性疟原虫合并感染,其中包括一名三种物种均呈阳性的患者。在288份RDT阴性样本中,鉴定出恶性疟原虫阳性样本(n = 24)、柯氏卵形疟原虫阳性样本(n = 3)、沃氏卵形疟原虫阳性样本(n = 1)和三日疟原虫阳性样本(n = 3),非恶性疟原虫阳性率为2.5%。

结论

这些发现强调了用于疟疾诊断的RDT的局限性,并表明塞内加尔存在非恶性疟原虫疟疾感染。目前用于常规临床诊断的RDT不一定能准确反映塞内加尔凯杜古的疟疾传播情况,诊断和患者护理以及监测和消除活动需要更敏感和特异的方法。这些发现对其他疟疾流行地区具有启示意义,在这些地区,除恶性疟原虫外的其他物种可能传播并被控制或消除活动忽视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a463/5209815/b683aacea703/12936_2016_1661_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验