Shoman Haitham, Karafillakis Emilie, Rawaf Salman
WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Education and Training, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Reynolds building, third floor, St Dunstans Road, W6 8RP, London, UK.
Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Global Health. 2017 Jan 4;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0224-2.
An Ebola outbreak started in December 2013 in Guinea and spread to Liberia and Sierra Leone in 2014. The health systems in place in the three countries lacked the infrastructure and the preparation to respond to the outbreak quickly and the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared a public health emergency of international concern on August 8 2014.
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of health systems' organisation and performance on the West African Ebola outbreak in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone and lessons learned. The WHO health system building blocks were used to evaluate the performance of the health systems in these countries.
A systematic review of articles published from inception until July 2015 was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Global Health, and the Cochrane library were searched for relevant literature. Grey literature was also searched through Google Scholar and Scopus. Articles were exported and selected based on a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data was then extracted into a spreadsheet and a descriptive analysis was performed. Each study was critically appraised using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. The review was supplemented with expert interviews where participants were identified from reference lists and using the snowball method.
Thirteen articles were included in the study and six experts from different organisations were interviewed. Findings were analysed based on the WHO health system building blocks. Shortage of health workforce had an important effect on the control of Ebola but also suffered the most from the outbreak. This was followed by information and research, medical products and technologies, health financing and leadership and governance. Poor surveillance and lack of proper communication also contributed to the outbreak. Lack of available funds jeopardised payments and purchase of essential resources and medicines. Leadership and governance had least findings but an overarching consensus that they would have helped prompt response, adequate coordination and management of resources.
Ensuring an adequate and efficient health workforce is of the utmost importance to ensure a strong health system and a quick response to new outbreaks. Adequate service delivery results from a collective success of the other blocks. Health financing and its management is crucial to ensure availability of medical products, fund payments to staff and purchase necessary equipment. However, leadership and governance needs to be rigorously explored on their main defects to control the outbreak.
2013年12月在几内亚爆发了埃博拉疫情,并于2014年蔓延至利比里亚和塞拉利昂。这三个国家现有的卫生系统缺乏迅速应对疫情的基础设施和准备,世界卫生组织(WHO)于2014年8月8日宣布这是一场国际关注的突发公共卫生事件。
本研究的目的是确定卫生系统的组织和绩效对几内亚、利比里亚和塞拉利昂西非埃博拉疫情的影响以及所吸取的教训。采用世界卫生组织的卫生系统构建模块来评估这些国家卫生系统的绩效。
按照PRISMA指南,对从开始到2015年7月发表的文章进行系统综述。在电子数据库包括医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、全球健康数据库和考科蓝图书馆中检索相关文献。还通过谷歌学术和Scopus搜索灰色文献。根据一套纳入和排除标准导出并筛选文章。然后将数据提取到电子表格中并进行描述性分析。使用克罗伊批判性评价工具对每项研究进行严格评价。通过从参考文献列表中识别并使用滚雪球法确定参与者,对专家进行访谈以补充该综述。
该研究纳入了13篇文章,并采访了来自不同组织的6位专家。根据世界卫生组织的卫生系统构建模块对结果进行了分析。卫生人力短缺对埃博拉疫情的控制产生了重要影响,同时也是受疫情影响最严重的方面。其次是信息与研究、医疗产品与技术、卫生筹资以及领导与治理。监测不力和缺乏适当沟通也助长了疫情的爆发。缺乏可用资金危及了支付以及基本资源和药品的采购。领导与治理方面的研究结果最少,但有一个总体共识是,它们本有助于迅速做出反应、进行充分协调和资源管理。
确保有足够且高效的卫生人力对于确保强大的卫生系统以及对新疫情做出快速反应至关重要。其他模块的共同成功才能带来充足的服务提供。卫生筹资及其管理对于确保医疗产品的供应、向工作人员支付资金以及购买必要设备至关重要。然而,需要严格探究领导与治理在控制疫情方面的主要缺陷。