• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《临床诊疗报告团队标准化评估的有效性、可靠性和可接受性》

Validity, Reliability and Acceptability of the Team Standardized Assessment of Clinical Encounter Report.

作者信息

Wong Camilla L, Norris Mireille, Sinha Samir S, Zorzitto Maria L, Madala Sushma, Hamid Jemila S

机构信息

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Geriatrics, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Division of Geriatrics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can Geriatr J. 2016 Dec 23;19(4):182-188. doi: 10.5770/cgj.19.234. eCollection 2016 Dec.

DOI:10.5770/cgj.19.234
PMID:28050222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5178860/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Team Standardized Assessment of a Clinical Encounter Report (StACER) was designed for use in Geriatric Medicine residency programs to evaluate Communicator and Collaborator competencies.

METHODS

The Team StACER was completed by two geriatricians and interdisciplinary team members based on observations during a geriatric medicine team meeting. Postgraduate trainees were recruited from July 2010-November 2013. Inter-rater reliability between two geriatricians and between all team members was determined. Internal consistency of items for the constructs Communicator and Collaborator competencies was calculated. Raters completed a survey previously administered to Canadian geriatricians to assess face validity. Trainees completed a survey to determine the usefulness of this instrument as a feedback tool.

RESULTS

Thirty postgraduate trainees participated. The prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa range inter-rater reliability for Communicator and Collaborator items were 0.87-1.00 and 0.86-1.00, respectively. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for Communicator and Collaborator items was 0.997 (95% CI: 0.993-1.00) and 0.997 (95% CI: 0.997-1.00), respectively. The instrument lacked discriminatory power, as all trainees scored "meets requirements" in the overall assessment. Niney-three per cent and 86% of trainees found feedback useful for developing Communicator and Collaborator competencies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Team StACER has adequate inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Poor discriminatory power and face validity challenge the merit of using this evaluation tool. Trainees felt the tool provided useful feedback on Collaborator and Communicator competencies.

摘要

背景

团队临床会诊报告标准化评估(StACER)旨在用于老年医学住院医师培训项目,以评估沟通者和协作者能力。

方法

团队StACER由两名老年医学专家和跨学科团队成员根据老年医学团队会议期间的观察结果完成。2010年7月至2013年11月招募了研究生学员。确定了两名老年医学专家之间以及所有团队成员之间的评分者间信度。计算了沟通者和协作者能力结构项目的内部一致性。评分者完成了一项先前针对加拿大老年医学专家进行的调查,以评估表面效度。学员完成了一项调查,以确定该工具作为反馈工具的有用性。

结果

30名研究生学员参与。沟通者和协作者项目的患病率调整偏差调整kappa评分者间信度范围分别为0.87 - 1.00和0.86 - 1.00。沟通者和协作者项目的Cronbach's alpha系数分别为0.997(95% CI:0.993 - 1.00)和0.997(95% CI:0.997 - 1.00)。该工具缺乏区分能力,因为所有学员在总体评估中得分均为“符合要求”。分别有93%和86%的学员认为反馈对培养沟通者和协作者能力有用。

结论

团队StACER具有足够的评分者间信度和内部一致性。较差的区分能力和表面效度对使用该评估工具的价值提出了挑战。学员们认为该工具为协作者和沟通者能力提供了有用的反馈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c5b/5178860/1b6856d555bc/cgj-19-182f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c5b/5178860/4b45242a01fd/cgj-19-182f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c5b/5178860/1b6856d555bc/cgj-19-182f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c5b/5178860/4b45242a01fd/cgj-19-182f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c5b/5178860/1b6856d555bc/cgj-19-182f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity, Reliability and Acceptability of the Team Standardized Assessment of Clinical Encounter Report.《临床诊疗报告团队标准化评估的有效性、可靠性和可接受性》
Can Geriatr J. 2016 Dec 23;19(4):182-188. doi: 10.5770/cgj.19.234. eCollection 2016 Dec.
2
Use of the Consultation Letter Rating Scale among Geriatric Medicine Postgraduate Trainees.老年医学研究生使用咨询信函评分量表。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2157-2160. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16124. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
3
Assessment of multiple physician competencies in postgraduate training: utility of the structured oral examination.研究生培训中多项医师能力的评估:结构化口头考试的效用。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 Dec;16(5):569-77. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9275-6. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
4
Reliability of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (ICAR) in multi source feedback (MSF) with post-graduate medical residents.跨专业协作评估量表(ICAR)在针对医学研究生住院医师的多源反馈(MSF)中的可靠性。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Dec 31;14:1049. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0279-9.
5
Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.将跨专业团队概念化为多团队系统——对评估和培训的启示
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):366-9. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077136.
6
Contextualization and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (ICAR) through simulation: Pilot investigation.通过模拟对跨专业协作评估量表(ICAR)进行情境化与验证:初步调查
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Aug 1;30:403. eCollection 2016.
7
Team member expectations of trainee communicator and collaborator competencies - so shines a good deed in a weary world?团队成员对学员沟通者和合作者能力的期望 - 做好事在疲惫的世界中如此闪耀?
Med Teach. 2021 May;43(5):531-537. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1874325. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
The MacTRAUMA TTL Assessment Tool: Developing a Novel Tool for Assessing Performance of Trauma Trainees: Initial Reliability Testing.MacTRAUMA TTL评估工具:开发一种用于评估创伤实习医生表现的新型工具:初始信度测试。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):1046-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
9
The Community Assessment of Risk Instrument: Investigation of Inter-Rater Reliability of an Instrument Measuring Risk of Adverse Outcomes.社区风险评估工具:一种测量不良后果风险的工具的评分者间信度调查
J Frailty Aging. 2015;4(2):80-9. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2015.40.
10
Validity aspects of the patient feedback questionnaire on consultation skills (PFC), a promising learning instrument in medical education.患者咨询技能反馈问卷(PFC)有效性方面的研究,这是医学教育中一种有前途的学习工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):202-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Last Issue, 2016.上一期,2016年。
Can Geriatr J. 2016 Dec 23;19(4):163. doi: 10.5770/cgj.19.262. eCollection 2016 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Cluster analysis for identifying sub-groups and selecting potential discriminatory variables in human encephalitis.基于聚类分析的人类脑炎亚群识别和潜在鉴别变量选择
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Dec 31;10:364. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-364.
2
Effectiveness of pre-licensure interprofessional education and post-licensure collaborative interventions.执照前跨专业教育和执照后协作干预的效果
J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:148-65. doi: 10.1080/13561820500082800.
3
Curriculum recommendations for Resident Training in Geriatrics Interdisciplinary Team Care.
老年医学跨学科团队护理住院医师培训课程建议。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Sep;47(9):1145-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb05242.x.
4
Bias, prevalence and kappa.偏倚、患病率及kappa值
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):423-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v.
5
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.