• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[在老年人中建立本地公民参与:一个参与式项目]

[Building local citizen participation among older adults : A participatory project].

作者信息

Douma Linden, Bouwman Ruben, Hutter Inge, Meijering Louise

机构信息

Basiseenheid Demografie, Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Nederland.

Healthy Ageing, Population and Society, Rijkuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Nederland.

出版信息

Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Feb;48(1):4-13. doi: 10.1007/s12439-016-0203-3.

DOI:10.1007/s12439-016-0203-3
PMID:28050769
Abstract

AIM

Dutch municipalities are looking for ways to promote citizen participation, among which older adults. This paper discusses older adults' experiences regarding favoring and inhibiting factors for lasting and independent citizen participation around the themes of housing, wellbeing and health care.

METHODS

The participatory research project lasted from April 2014 to March 2016. The organizational structure consisted of a working group, a group of 21 participants (aged 65+) and the research team. Interviews and focus-group discussions were used.

RESULTS

The project did not result in lasting and independent citizen participation of older adults, as was intended beforehand. When we examined the experiences of the participants, we found that their participation was favored and inhibited by the factors Can do, Like to, Enabled to, Asked to, and Responded to.

CONCLUSIONS

In order for citizen participation to be successful, all five identified factors should be met by the stakeholders involved. To achieve this we recommend to fine-tune the mutual expectations of the stakeholders, using the CLEAR model. The empirically grounded knowledge, generated throughout the project, strengthens the existing evidence-base about participation of older adults and helps to shape local participation programs.

摘要

目的

荷兰各市镇正在寻找促进公民参与的方法,其中包括老年人。本文围绕住房、福祉和医疗保健主题,探讨老年人在持久且独立的公民参与方面的有利因素和阻碍因素的相关经历。

方法

参与式研究项目从2014年4月持续至2016年3月。组织结构包括一个工作组、一组21名参与者(65岁及以上)和研究团队。采用了访谈和焦点小组讨论的方式。

结果

该项目并未如预先设想的那样,实现老年人持久且独立的公民参与。在考察参与者的经历时,我们发现他们的参与受到“有能力做”“愿意做”“有条件做”“被要求做”和“做出回应”等因素的促进和阻碍。

结论

为使公民参与取得成功,相关利益攸关方应满足所有已确定的五个因素。为实现这一点,我们建议使用CLEAR模型来微调利益攸关方之间的相互期望。在整个项目过程中产生的基于实证的知识,强化了关于老年人参与的现有证据基础,并有助于制定地方参与计划。

相似文献

1
[Building local citizen participation among older adults : A participatory project].[在老年人中建立本地公民参与:一个参与式项目]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Feb;48(1):4-13. doi: 10.1007/s12439-016-0203-3.
2
Evaluating the participatory process in a community-based heart health project.评估一个基于社区的心脏健康项目中的参与过程。
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Oct;55(7):1173-87. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00247-7.
3
Including citizens in institutional reviews: expectations and experiences from the Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate.让公民参与机构审查:荷兰医疗保健检查局的期望与经验
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1463-73. doi: 10.1111/hex.12126. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
4
Participatory approaches to promote healthy lifestyles among Turkish and Moroccan women in Amsterdam.在阿姆斯特丹促进土耳其和摩洛哥女性健康生活方式的参与式方法。
Promot Educ. 2008 Dec;15(4):17-23. doi: 10.1177/1025382308097694.
5
The evaluation of citizen participation in policymaking: Insights from Portugal.公民参与政策制定的评估:来自葡萄牙的见解。
Eval Program Plann. 2021 Feb;84:101895. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101895. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
6
Active and healthy ageing in urban environments: laying the groundwork for solution-building through citizen science.积极健康的城市环境老龄化:通过公民科学为解决方案的制定奠定基础。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Aug 1;37(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac126.
7
The Station Community Mental Health Centre Inc: nurturing and empowering.车站社区心理健康中心有限公司:关怀与赋能。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Jul-Sep;10(3):1411. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
8
Evaluating the participatory process in a community-based health promotion project.评估一个基于社区的健康促进项目中的参与过程。
J Prev Interv Community. 2010;38(1):55-69. doi: 10.1080/10852350903393459.
9
Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review.公民参与健康、护理或福祉技术创新研究:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Sep 2;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01152-4.
10
Levers for Change and Unexpected Outcomes of a Participatory Research Partnership: Toward Fostering Older adults' Social Participation to Promote Health Equity.改变的杠杆和参与式研究伙伴关系的意外结果:促进老年人的社会参与以促进健康公平。
Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Dec;66(3-4):417-426. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12444. Epub 2020 Jul 22.