Tsai Ming-Han, Lin Xiaochen, Shumilov Anatoliy, Bernhardt Katharina, Feederle Regina, Poirey Remy, Kopp-Schneider Annette, Pereira Bruno, Almeida Raquel, Delecluse Henri-Jacques
German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Unit F100, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Inserm unit U1074, DKFZ, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 7;8(6):10238-10254. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14380.
The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is etiologically associated with the development of multiple types of tumors, but it is unclear whether this diversity is due to infection with different EBV strains. We report a comparative characterization of SNU719, GP202, and YCCEL1, three EBV strains that were isolated from gastric carcinomas, M81, a virus isolated in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma and several well-characterized laboratory type A strains. We found that B95-8, Akata and GP202 induced cell growth more efficiently than YCCEL1, SNU719 and M81 and this correlated positively with the expression levels of the viral BHRF1 miRNAs. In infected B cells, all strains except Akata and B95-8 induced lytic replication, a risk factor for carcinoma development, although less efficiently than M81. The panel of viruses induced tumors in immunocompromised mice with variable speed and efficacy that did not strictly mirror their in vitro characteristics, suggesting that additional parameters play an important role. We found that YCCEL1 and M81 infected primary epithelial cells, gastric carcinoma cells and gastric spheroids more efficiently than Akata or B95-8. Reciprocally, Akata and B95-8 had a stronger tropism for B cells than YCCEL1 or M81. These data suggest that different EBV strains will induce the development of lymphoid tumors with variable efficacy in immunocompromised patients and that there is a parallel between the cell tropism of the viral strains and the lineage of the tumors they induce. Thus, EBV strains can be endowed with properties that will influence their transforming abilities and the type of tumor they induce.
爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)在病因学上与多种肿瘤的发生相关,但尚不清楚这种多样性是否归因于感染不同的EBV毒株。我们报告了从胃癌中分离出的三种EBV毒株SNU719、GP202和YCCEL1、从鼻咽癌中分离出的病毒M81以及几种特征明确的实验室A型毒株的比较特征。我们发现,B95-8、Akata和GP202比YCCEL1、SNU719和M81更有效地诱导细胞生长,这与病毒BHRF1微小RNA的表达水平呈正相关。在受感染的B细胞中,除Akata和B95-8外,所有毒株均诱导裂解复制,这是肿瘤发生的一个危险因素,尽管效率低于M81。这组病毒在免疫功能低下的小鼠中诱导肿瘤的速度和效力各不相同,并不严格反映它们的体外特征,这表明其他参数起着重要作用。我们发现,YCCEL1和M81比Akata或B95-8更有效地感染原代上皮细胞、胃癌细胞和胃球体。相反,Akata和B95-8对B细胞的嗜性比YCCEL1或M81更强。这些数据表明,不同的EBV毒株将在免疫功能低下的患者中以不同的效力诱导淋巴肿瘤的发生,并且病毒毒株的细胞嗜性与其诱导的肿瘤谱系之间存在平行关系。因此,EBV毒株可以具有影响其转化能力和所诱导肿瘤类型的特性。