Suppr超能文献

与不符合美国外科医师学会非三级中心转运标准的创伤患者未转运相关的因素。

Factors Associated With Nontransfer in Trauma Patients Meeting American College of Surgeons' Criteria for Transfer at Nontertiary Centers.

作者信息

Zhou Quanhong, Rosengart Matthew R, Billiar Timothy R, Peitzman Andrew B, Sperry Jason L, Brown Joshua B

机构信息

Division of General Surgery and Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Division of General Surgery and Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 1;152(4):369-376. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4976.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Secondary triage from nontertiary centers is vital to trauma system success. It remains unclear what factors are associated with nontransfer among patients who should be considered for transfer to facilities providing higher-level care.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with nontransfer among patients meeting American College of Surgeons (ACS) guideline criteria for transfer from nontertiary centers.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using multilevel logistic regression to ascertain factors associated with nontransfer from nontertiary centers, including demographics, injury characteristics, and center resources. With information obtained from the National Trauma Data Bank (January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2012), relative proportion of variance in outcome across centers was determined for patient-level and center-level attributes. In all, 96 528 patients taken to nontertiary centers (levels III, IV, V, and nontrauma centers) that met ACS guideline transfer criteria were eligible for inclusion. Data analysis was performed from March 17, 2016, to May 20, 2016.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was nontransfer from a nontertiary center.

RESULTS

Among 96 528 patients meeting ACS guideline criteria for transfer taken initially to nontertiary centers, 55 611 (57.6%) were male and the median age was 52 years (interquartile range, 28-77 years). Only 19 396 patients (20.1%) underwent transfer. Patient-level factors associated with nontransfer included age older than 65 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.46-1.98; P < .001), severe chest injury (AOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.42-1.89; P < .001), and commercial insurance (vs self-pay: AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67; P < .001). Center-level factors associated with nontransfer included larger bed size (>600 vs <200 beds: AOR, 9.22; 95% CI, 7.70-11.05; P < .001), nontrauma center (vs level III centers: AOR, 2.71; 95% CI, 2.44-3.01; P < .001), university affiliation (vs community: AOR, 9.68; 95% CI, 8.03-11.66; P < .001), more trauma surgeons (per surgeon: AOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.09; P < .001), and more neurosurgeons (per surgeon: AOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.23-1.28; P < .001). For-profit status was associated with nontransfer at nontrauma centers (AOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.39-1.74; P < .001), but not at level III, IV, and V trauma centers. Overall, patient-level factors accounted for 36% and center-level factors accounted for 58% of the variation in transfer practices. Patient-level factors accounted for more variation at level III, IV, and V trauma centers (44%), but less variation at nontrauma centers (13%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Only 1 in 5 patients meeting ACS transfer criteria underwent transfer. Factors associated with nontransfer may be useful for trauma system stakeholders to target education and outreach to guide development of more inclusive trauma systems. Further study is necessary to critically evaluate whether these ACS criteria identify patients who require transfer.

摘要

重要性

非三级中心的二级分诊对于创伤系统的成功至关重要。对于那些应考虑转至提供更高水平治疗的医疗机构的患者,哪些因素与未转诊相关仍不清楚。

目的

确定符合美国外科医师学会(ACS)从非三级中心转诊指南标准的患者中与未转诊相关的因素。

设计、设置和参与者:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用多水平逻辑回归来确定与从非三级中心未转诊相关的因素,包括人口统计学、损伤特征和中心资源。利用从国家创伤数据库(2007年1月1日至2012年12月31日)获得的信息,确定了患者层面和中心层面属性在各中心结局差异中的相对比例。共有96528例被送往符合ACS转诊指南标准的非三级中心(三级、四级、五级和非创伤中心)的患者符合纳入条件。数据分析于2016年3月17日至2016年5月20日进行。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是未从非三级中心转诊。

结果

在96528例最初被送往非三级中心且符合ACS转诊指南标准的患者中,55611例(57.6%)为男性,中位年龄为52岁(四分位间距,28 - 77岁)。只有19396例患者(20.1%)接受了转诊。与未转诊相关的患者层面因素包括年龄大于65岁(调整后的优势比[AOR],1.70;95%置信区间[CI],1.46 - 1.98;P <.001)、严重胸部损伤(AOR,1.63;95% CI,1.42 - 1.89;P <.001)和商业保险(与自费相比:AOR,1.39;95% CI,1.15 - 1.67;P <.001)。与未转诊相关的中心层面因素包括床位数较多(>600张床与<200张床相比:AOR,9.22;95% CI,7.70 - 11.05;P <.001)、非创伤中心(与三级中心相比:AOR,2.71;95% CI,2.44 - 3.01;P <.001)、大学附属关系(与社区相比:AOR,9.68;95% CI,8.03 - 11.66;P <.001)、更多的创伤外科医生(每位外科医生:AOR,1.08;95% CI,1.06 - 1.09;P <.001)和更多的神经外科医生(每位外科医生:AOR,1.25;95% CI,1.23 - 1.28;P <.001)。营利性状态与非创伤中心的未转诊相关(AOR,1.55;95% CI,1.39 - 1.74;P <.001),但在三级、四级和五级创伤中心则不然。总体而言,患者层面因素占转诊实践差异的36%,中心层面因素占58%。患者层面因素在三级、四级和五级创伤中心占的差异更多(44%),但在非创伤中心占的差异较少(13%)。

结论及相关性

符合ACS转诊标准的患者中只有五分之一接受了转诊。与未转诊相关的因素可能有助于创伤系统利益相关者针对教育和推广工作进行目标定位,以指导更具包容性的创伤系统的发展。有必要进一步研究以严格评估这些ACS标准是否能识别出需要转诊的患者。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Hospital Affiliation on Hospital Transfer Practices.医院附属关系对医院转诊行为的影响。
Health Serv Insights. 2025 Jul 23;18:11786329251357378. doi: 10.1177/11786329251357378. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验