Hsia Renee Y, Wang Ewen, Saynina Olga, Wise Paul, Pérez-Stable Eliseo J, Auerbach Andrew
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):585-92. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.311. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
To estimate the likelihood of trauma center admission for injured elderly patients with trauma, determine trends in trauma center admissions, and identify factors associated with trauma center use for elderly patients with trauma.
Retrospective analysis.
Acute care hospitals in California.
All patients hospitalized for acute traumatic injuries during the period from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2008 (n = 430,081). Patients who had scheduled admissions for nonacute or minor trauma were excluded.
Likelihood of admission to level I or II trauma center was calculated according to age categories after adjusting for patient and system factors.
Of 430,081 patients admitted to California acute care hospitals for trauma-related diagnoses, 27% were older than 65 years. After adjusting for demographic, clinical, and system factors, compared with trauma patients aged 18-25 years, the odds of admission to a trauma center decreased with increasing age; patients aged 26-45 years had lower odds (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.80) of being admitted to a trauma center for their injuries than did patients 46-65 years of age (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.54-0.60), patients 66-85 years of age (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.30-0.41), and patients older than 85 years (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.25-0.36). Similar patterns were found when stratifying the analysis by trauma type and severity. Living more than 50 miles away from a trauma center (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.06) and lack of county trauma center (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09-0.35) were also predictors of not receiving trauma care.
Age and likelihood of admission to a trauma center for injured patients were observed to be inversely proportional after controlling for other factors. System-level factors play a major role in determining which injured patients receive trauma care.
评估创伤老年患者入住创伤中心的可能性,确定创伤中心入院趋势,并识别与创伤老年患者使用创伤中心相关的因素。
回顾性分析。
加利福尼亚州的急性护理医院。
1999年1月1日至2008年12月31日期间因急性创伤性损伤住院的所有患者(n = 430,081)。排除计划进行非急性或轻微创伤入院的患者。
在调整患者和系统因素后,根据年龄类别计算入住I级或II级创伤中心的可能性。
在因创伤相关诊断入住加利福尼亚州急性护理医院的430,081名患者中,27%年龄超过65岁。在调整人口统计学、临床和系统因素后,与18 - 25岁的创伤患者相比,入住创伤中心的几率随年龄增长而降低;26 - 45岁的患者因伤入住创伤中心的几率(优势比[OR],0.75;95%置信区间[CI],0.71 - 0.80)低于46 - 65岁的患者(OR,0.57;95% CI,0.54 - 0.60)、66 - 85岁的患者(OR,0.35;95% CI,0.30 - 0.41)以及85岁以上的患者(OR,0.30;95% CI,0.25 - 0.36)。按创伤类型和严重程度分层分析时也发现了类似模式。居住在距离创伤中心50英里以上(OR,0.03;95% CI,0.01 - 0.06)以及所在县没有创伤中心(OR,0.17;95% CI,0.09 - 0.35)也是未接受创伤护理的预测因素。
在控制其他因素后,观察到受伤患者的年龄与入住创伤中心的可能性成反比。系统层面的因素在确定哪些受伤患者接受创伤护理方面起主要作用。