• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本猕猴对无生命移动物体的目标归因。

Goal attribution to inanimate moving objects by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).

机构信息

Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-8555, Japan.

Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi 484-8506, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 5;7:40033. doi: 10.1038/srep40033.

DOI:10.1038/srep40033
PMID:28053305
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5215463/
Abstract

Humans interpret others' goals based on motion information, and this capacity contributes to our mental reasoning. The present study sought to determine whether Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) perceive goal-directedness in chasing events depicted by two geometric particles. In Experiment 1, two monkeys and adult humans were trained to discriminate between Chasing and Random sequences. We then introduced probe stimuli with various levels of correlation between the particle trajectories to examine whether participants performed the task using higher correlation. Participants chose stimuli with the highest correlations by chance, suggesting that correlations were not the discriminative cue. Experiment 2 examined whether participants focused on particle proximity. Participants differentiated between Chasing and Control sequences; the distance between two particles was identical in both. Results indicated that, like humans, the Japanese macaques did not use physical cues alone to perform the discrimination task and integrated the cues spontaneously. This suggests that goal attribution resulting from motion information is a widespread cognitive phenotype in primate species.

摘要

人类根据运动信息来解释他人的目标,这种能力有助于我们进行心理推理。本研究旨在确定日本猕猴(Macaca fuscata)是否能理解由两个几何粒子描绘的追逐事件的目标指向性。在实验 1 中,两只猴子和成年人类被训练区分追逐和随机序列。然后,我们引入了具有不同粒子轨迹相关性水平的探测刺激,以检查参与者是否使用更高的相关性来完成任务。参与者随机选择了相关性最高的刺激,这表明相关性不是区分线索。实验 2 检验了参与者是否关注粒子的接近程度。参与者区分了追逐和控制序列;两个粒子之间的距离在两种情况下是相同的。结果表明,与人类一样,日本猕猴不会仅使用物理线索来执行区分任务,而是自发地整合线索。这表明,源自运动信息的目标归因是灵长类物种中广泛存在的认知表型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/5215463/98e5ff897350/srep40033-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/5215463/e5d39740fadb/srep40033-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/5215463/98e5ff897350/srep40033-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/5215463/e5d39740fadb/srep40033-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f8/5215463/98e5ff897350/srep40033-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Goal attribution to inanimate moving objects by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).日本猕猴对无生命移动物体的目标归因。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 5;7:40033. doi: 10.1038/srep40033.
2
Perception of chasing in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)对追逐行为的感知。
Anim Cogn. 2015 Nov;18(6):1243-53. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0893-x. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
3
Interference effects by spatial proximity and age-related declines in spatial memory by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): deficits in the combined use of multiple spatial cues.日本猕猴(食蟹猴)因空间接近产生的干扰效应及与年龄相关的空间记忆衰退:多种空间线索联合运用方面的缺陷
J Comp Psychol. 2007 May;121(2):189-97. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.189.
4
Perception of the motion trajectory of objects from moving cast shadows in infant Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).从运动阴影中感知运动物体的轨迹:婴儿期日本猕猴(Macaca fuscata)的研究
Dev Sci. 2013 Mar;16(2):227-233. doi: 10.1111/desc.12020.
5
Relative pitch perception in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata).日本猕猴(食蟹猴)的相对音高感知
J Comp Psychol. 2001 Jun;115(2):127-31. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.127.
6
Role of vocal tract characteristics in individual discrimination by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).声道特征在日本猕猴(Macaca fuscata)个体识别中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 23;6:32042. doi: 10.1038/srep32042.
7
Sexual dimorphism in facial shapes and their discrimination in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata).日本猕猴(猕猴属)面部形状的两性异形及其辨别
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):326-33. doi: 10.1037/a0016219.
8
Do infant Japanese macaques ( Macaca fuscata) categorize objects without specific training?日本猕猴幼崽在没有特定训练的情况下会对物体进行分类吗?
Primates. 2004 Jan;45(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10329-003-0053-9. Epub 2003 Sep 19.
9
Effect of small cue-response separation on pattern discrimination in macaques (Macaca fuscata and M. mulatta).小线索-反应间隔对猕猴(日本猕猴和恒河猴)模式辨别能力的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 1986 Jun;100(2):137-42.
10
Is attentional prioritisation of infant faces unique in humans?: Comparative demonstrations by modified dot-probe task in monkeys.婴儿面孔的注意力优先选择在人类中是独特的吗?:通过对猴子进行改良点探测任务的比较演示
Behav Processes. 2013 Sep;98:31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Tonkean macaques do not prefer the helper or the hinderer in the hill paradigm.豚尾猕猴在山丘范式中并不偏爱帮助者或阻碍者。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 27;12(8):250488. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250488. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Revisiting the Heider and Simmel experiment for social meaning attribution in virtual reality.重新审视海德和西梅尔在虚拟现实中进行社会意义归因的实验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):17103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65532-0.
3
Seeing social interactions.观察社会互动。

本文引用的文献

1
Perception of chasing in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)对追逐行为的感知。
Anim Cogn. 2015 Nov;18(6):1243-53. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0893-x. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
2
Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).灵长类动物对单人纸牌幻觉的看法是否不同?对人类(智人)、黑猩猩(黑猩猩)、恒河猴(猕猴)和卷尾猴(卷尾猴)的比较评估。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 Nov;128(4):402-13. doi: 10.1037/a0037499. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
3
Interobject spacing explains the attentional bias toward interacting objects.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Dec;27(12):1165-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
4
When shapes are more than shapes: perceptual, developmental, and neurophysiological basis for attributions of animacy and theory of mind.当形状超越形状:赋予生命感及心理理论的感知、发展和神经生理学基础。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 7;14:1168739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168739. eCollection 2023.
5
Gaze patterns and brain activations in humans and marmosets in the Frith-Happé theory-of-mind animation task.人类和狨猴在 Frith-Happé 心理理论动画任务中的注视模式和大脑活动。
Elife. 2023 Jul 14;12:e86327. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86327.
6
No evidence that monkeys attribute mental states to animated shapes in the Heider-Simmel videos.没有证据表明猴子会将心理状态归因于海德尔-西梅尔视频中的动画形状。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3050. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82702-6.
物体间间距解释了对相互作用物体的注意偏向。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):412-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0496-y.
4
Rudimentary sympathy in preverbal infants: preference for others in distress.前言语婴儿的基本同理心:对困境中他人的偏好。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 12;8(6):e65292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065292. Print 2013.
5
Do robots have goals? How agent cues influence action understanding in non-human primates.机器人有目标吗?主体线索如何影响非人类灵长类动物对动作的理解。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Jun 1;246:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.01.047. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
6
Infants' perception of chasing.婴儿对追逐的感知。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
7
Dissociating the detection of intentionality from animacy in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus.在右后上颞叶区分意图的检测和能动性。
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 10;32(41):14276-80. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0562-12.2012.
8
Nine-months-old infants do not need to know what the agent prefers in order to reason about its goals: on the role of preference and persistence in infants' goal-attribution.九个月大的婴儿不需要知道代理人喜欢什么就能推理出它的目标:关于偏好和坚持在婴儿目标归因中的作用。
Dev Sci. 2012 Sep;15(5):714-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01151.x. Epub 2012 May 31.
9
Even simple forms of social learning rely on intention attribution in marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus).即使是简单形式的社会学习也依赖于狨猴(绢毛猴)的意图归因。
J Comp Psychol. 2012 May;126(2):129-38. doi: 10.1037/a0026025. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
10
Chasing vs. stalking: interrupting the perception of animacy.追逐与跟踪:打断对能动性的感知。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):669-84. doi: 10.1037/a0020735.