• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高保真医学模拟训练可提高医学生在感染性休克复苏方面的知识水平和信心。

High-fidelity medical simulation training improves medical students' knowledge and confidence levels in septic shock resuscitation.

作者信息

Vattanavanit Veerapong, Kawla-Ied Jarernporn, Bhurayanontachai Rungsun

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

Open Access Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 22;9:1-7. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S122525. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S122525
PMID:28053558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5191579/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Septic shock resuscitation bundles have poor compliance worldwide partly due to a lack of knowledge and clinical skills. High-fidelity simulation-based training is a new teaching technology in our faculty which may improve the performance of medical students in the resuscitation process. However, since the efficacy of this training method in our institute is limited, we organized an extra class for this evaluation.

PURPOSE

The aim was to evaluate the effect on medical students' knowledge and confidence levels after the high-fidelity medical simulation training in septic shock management.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in sixth year medical students during an internal medicine rotation between November 2015 and March 2016. The simulation class was a 2-hour session of a septic shock management scenario and post-training debriefing. Knowledge assessment was determined by a five-question pre-test and post-test examination. At the end of the class, the students completed their confidence evaluation questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 79 medical students, the mean percentage score ± standard deviation (SD) of the post-test examination was statistically significantly higher than the pre-test (66.83%±19.7% vs 47.59%±19.7%, <0.001). In addition, the student mean percentage confidence level ± SD in management of septic shock was significantly better after the simulation class (68.10%±12.2% vs 51.64%±13.1%, <0.001). They also strongly suggested applying this simulation class to the current curriculum.

CONCLUSION

High-fidelity medical simulation improved the students' knowledge and confidence in septic shock resuscitation. This simulation class should be included in the curriculum of the sixth year medical students in our institute.

摘要

背景

感染性休克复苏集束在全球范围内的依从性较差,部分原因是缺乏相关知识和临床技能。基于高仿真模拟的培训是我们学院的一项新教学技术,可能会提高医学生在复苏过程中的表现。然而,由于这种培训方法在我们学院的效果有限,我们组织了一次额外的课程进行评估。

目的

旨在评估高仿真医学模拟培训对医学生感染性休克管理知识和信心水平的影响。

方法

对2015年11月至2016年3月内科轮转期间的六年级医学生进行回顾性研究。模拟课程是一个为期2小时的感染性休克管理场景及培训后汇报会。知识评估通过一个包含五个问题的课前测试和课后测试来确定。课程结束时,学生们完成了他们的信心评估问卷。

结果

在79名医学生中,课后测试的平均百分比得分±标准差(SD)在统计学上显著高于课前测试(66.83%±19.7%对47.59%±19.7%,<0.001)。此外,模拟课程后,学生在感染性休克管理方面的平均百分比信心水平±SD显著提高(68.10%±12.2%对51.64%±13.1%,<0.001)。他们还强烈建议将此模拟课程应用于当前课程。

结论

高仿真医学模拟提高了学生在感染性休克复苏方面的知识和信心。该模拟课程应纳入我们学院六年级医学生的课程中。

相似文献

1
High-fidelity medical simulation training improves medical students' knowledge and confidence levels in septic shock resuscitation.高保真医学模拟训练可提高医学生在感染性休克复苏方面的知识水平和信心。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 22;9:1-7. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S122525. eCollection 2017.
2
Comparison of knowledge and confidence between medical students as leaders and followers in simulated resuscitation.模拟复苏中作为领导者和跟随者的医学生的知识和信心比较。
Int J Med Educ. 2020 Jan 21;11:19-24. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5e01.f00c.
3
An educational course including medical simulation for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: an evaluation for medical student training.一门包括早期目标导向治疗医学模拟和严重脓毒症复苏集束治疗的教育课程:对医学生培训的评估
Resuscitation. 2009 Jun;80(6):674-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
4
[Evaluation of the impact and efficiency of high-fidelity simulation for neonatal resuscitation in midwifery education].[评估高保真模拟在助产教育中对新生儿复苏的影响及效果]
Arch Pediatr. 2014 Sep;21(9):968-75. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
5
Teaching medical students neonatal resuscitation: knowledge gained and retained from a brief simulation-based training workshop.向医学生传授新生儿复苏术:基于模拟的简短培训工作坊所获得并保留的知识
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2012 Nov;25(2):105-10. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.103457.
6
Using multimedia tools and high-fidelity simulations to improve medical students' resuscitation performance: an observational study.使用多媒体工具和高保真模拟来提高医学生的复苏表现:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 26;6(9):e012195. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012195.
7
High-fidelity simulation is superior to case-based discussion in teaching the management of shock.高保真模拟在休克管理教学中优于基于案例的讨论。
Med Teach. 2013;35(3):e1003-10. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.733043. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
8
Impact of simulator training and crew resource management training on final-year medical students' performance in sepsis resuscitation: a randomized trial.模拟培训和团队资源管理培训对医学生脓毒症复苏表现的影响:一项随机试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Aug;78(8):901-9. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
9
Evaluation of teaching effect of first-aid comprehensive simulation-based education in clinical medical students.临床医学生急救综合模拟教育教学效果评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;10:909889. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.909889. eCollection 2022.
10
Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?视频反馈分析能否提高五年级医学生的心肺复苏表现?
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 12;16(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparing Medical Students for Sideline Sports Care in Underserved Communities: A Comparison of Simulation and Lecture-Based Training.为服务不足社区的医学生提供业余运动护理培训:模拟培训与基于讲座培训的比较
Cureus. 2025 Jun 17;17(6):e86208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86208. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Implementation of hybrid simulation training to promote collective and self-efficacy in medical students: a two-pronged approach.实施混合模拟训练以提高医学生的集体效能感和自我效能感:一种双管齐下的方法。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2527362. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2527362. Epub 2025 Jul 5.
3
The use of non-invasive ventilation by emergency doctors in Johannesburg Academic Hospitals, South Africa - assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices.南非约翰内斯堡学术医院急诊医生使用无创通气的情况——知识、态度及实践评估
Afr J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;13(4):322-327. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2023.11.002. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
4
Performance effects of simulation training for medical students - a systematic review.模拟训练对医学生表现的影响——系统评价。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Nov 15;39(5):Doc51. doi: 10.3205/zma001572. eCollection 2022.
5
Learning Outcomes of High-fidelity versus Table-Top Simulation in Undergraduate Emergency Medicine Education: Prospective, Randomized, Crossover-Controlled Study.高保真模拟与桌面模拟在本科急诊医学教育中的学习效果比较:前瞻性、随机、交叉对照研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):20-25. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.12.53926.
6
Coronavirus-19 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C): A Pediatric Simulation Case for Residents, Fellows, and Advanced Practice Providers.儿童多系统炎症综合征(MIS-C)与 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19):住院医师、研究员和高级执业医师的儿科模拟病例。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Aug 16;17:11180. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11180. eCollection 2021.
7
Prolonged, High-Fidelity Simulation for Study of Patient Care in Resource-Limited Medical Contexts and for Technology Comparative Effectiveness Testing.在资源有限的医疗环境中用于患者护理研究以及技术比较有效性测试的长时间高保真模拟。
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jul 6;3(7):e0477. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000477. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Outcome of Undergraduate Medical Education using Medical Simulation according to Students' Feedback.基于学生反馈的医学模拟在本科医学教育中的应用效果。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020 Aug;20(3):e310-e315. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.03.010. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
Comparison of knowledge and confidence between medical students as leaders and followers in simulated resuscitation.模拟复苏中作为领导者和跟随者的医学生的知识和信心比较。
Int J Med Educ. 2020 Jan 21;11:19-24. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5e01.f00c.

本文引用的文献

1
Trauma Simulation Training Increases Confidence Levels in Prehospital Personnel Performing Life-Saving Interventions in Trauma Patients.创伤模拟训练可提高院前急救人员对创伤患者实施救生干预措施时的信心水平。
Emerg Med Int. 2016;2016:5437490. doi: 10.1155/2016/5437490. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
2
High-Fidelity Patient Simulation Increases Dietetic Students' Self-Efficacy Prior to Clinical Supervised Practice: A Preliminary Study.高保真患者模拟提高营养专业学生临床督导实习前的自我效能感:一项初步研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016 Sep;48(8):563-567.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
3
The effects of an enhanced simulation programme on medical students' confidence responding to clinical deterioration.强化模拟程序对医学生应对临床病情恶化时信心的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jun 10;16:161. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0685-2.
4
Mortality Reduction and Long-Term Compliance with Surviving Sepsis Campaign: A Nationwide Multicenter Study.脓毒症存活策略的死亡率降低及长期依从性:一项全国性多中心研究
Shock. 2016 Jun;45(6):598-606. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000555.
5
Self-perceived versus objectively measured competence in performing clinical practical procedures by final year medical students.即将毕业的医学生在临床实践操作中自我认知的能力与客观测量的能力对比
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Apr 30;7:122-9. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5709.2a7e.
6
Evaluating the Impact of Classroom Education on the Management of Septic Shock Using Human Patient Simulation.使用人体患者模拟评估课堂教育对感染性休克管理的影响。
Simul Healthc. 2016 Feb;11(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000126.
7
Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Medical Students' Knowledge about Advanced Life Support: A Randomized Study.高保真模拟对医学生高级生命支持知识的影响:一项随机研究。
PLoS One. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0125685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125685. eCollection 2015.
8
Implementation of standardized dosing units for i.v. medications.静脉用药标准化给药单位的实施。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014 Dec 15;71(24):2153-8. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140046.
9
Are adequate fluid challenges prescribed for severe sepsis?
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27(8):719-28. doi: 10.1108/ijhcqa-01-2014-0013.
10
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动:一项长达 7.5 年的研究中,绩效指标与结局之间的关系。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Nov;40(11):1623-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3496-0. Epub 2014 Oct 1.