Medical Skills & Simulation Centre, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Department of Family & Community Medicine, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020 Aug;20(3):e310-e315. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.03.010. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
This study aimed to determine students' overall satisfaction with clinical simulation sessions and compare the satisfaction levels of obstetrics/gynaecology (OBGYN) students (group one) and internal medicine students (group two).
This study was conducted from January to June 2019 at the Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain. Students from year five were included and offered sessions that used simulations to support clinical skill development. Data were collected using a five-point Likert scale (i.e. strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) via feedback forms.
A total of 150 students were included in this study (response rate: 99.07%). In groups of seven, the students attended five cycles of simulations with two sessions per cycle in each specialty over six months. The mean percentage of responses of "strongly agree" and "agree" was 97.8 ± 2.3% in group one and 95.7 ± 2.7% in group two. The satisfaction scores of group one were higher than those from group two for all statements. Significant differences were found between groups one and two in their responses to the statement of whether the simulation session was relevant to clinical practice (100% versus 92.9%; <0.001) and whether the debriefing session was useful (98.1% versus 94.8%; = 0.015).
Students indicated high satisfaction after attending the simulation sessions; however, OBGYN students were more satisfied compared to those studying internal medicine.
本研究旨在确定学生对临床模拟课程的总体满意度，并比较妇产科（OBGYN）学生（第 1 组）和内科学生（第 2 组）的满意度水平。
本研究于 2019 年 1 月至 6 月在巴林麦纳麦的阿拉伯海湾大学进行。纳入五年级学生，并提供使用模拟支持临床技能发展的课程。通过反馈表使用五点李克特量表（即非常同意、同意、中立、不同意、非常不同意）收集数据。
共有 150 名学生参加了这项研究（应答率：99.07%）。学生以 7 人为一组，在六个月内每个专业进行五个周期的模拟，每个周期进行两次模拟课程。第 1 组的“非常同意”和“同意”的平均百分比为 97.8 ± 2.3%，第 2 组为 95.7 ± 2.7%。第 1 组的满意度评分在所有陈述中均高于第 2 组。第 1 组和第 2 组在模拟课程与临床实践的相关性（100%对 92.9%；<0.001）和讨论环节是否有用（98.1%对 94.8%；=0.015）这两个陈述上的回答存在显著差异。
学生在参加模拟课程后表示高度满意；然而，与学习内科的学生相比，妇产科学生更满意。
