• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌切除术后成本增加与并发症有关,而非微创外科技术。

Complications, Not Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique, Are Associated with Increased Cost after Esophagectomy.

作者信息

Fu Sue J, Ho Vanessa P, Ginsberg Jennifer, Perry Yaron, Delaney Conor P, Linden Philip A, Towe Christopher W

机构信息

Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Surg. 2016;2016:7690632. doi: 10.1155/2016/7690632. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1155/2016/7690632
PMID:28053785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5178372/
Abstract

. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) techniques offer similar oncological and surgical outcomes to open methods. The effects of MIE on hospital costs are not well documented. . We reviewed the electronic records of patients who underwent esophagectomy at a single academic institution between January 2012 and December 2014. Esophagectomy techniques were grouped into open, hybrid, MIE, and transhiatal (THE) esophagectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of surgery on total hospital cost after esophagectomy. . 80 patients were identified: 11 THE, 11 open, 41 hybrid, and 17 MIE. Median total cost of the hospitalization was $31,375 and was similar between surgical technique groups. MIE was associated with higher intraoperative costs, but not total hospital cost. Multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of a complication, increased age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV (ASA4), and preoperative coronary artery disease (CAD) were associated with significantly increased cost. . Despite the association of MIE with higher operation costs, the total hospital cost was not different between surgical technique groups. Postoperative complications and severe preoperative comorbidities are significant drivers of hospital cost associated with esophagectomy. Surgeons should choose technique based on clinical factors, rather than cost implications.

摘要

微创食管切除术(MIE)技术与开放手术方法相比,在肿瘤学和手术效果方面相似。MIE对医院成本的影响尚无充分记录。我们回顾了2012年1月至2014年12月期间在单一学术机构接受食管切除术的患者的电子病历。食管切除术技术分为开放、杂交、MIE和经裂孔(THE)食管切除术。进行单因素和多因素分析以评估手术对食管切除术后总住院费用的影响。共确定了80例患者:11例THE、11例开放手术、41例杂交手术和17例MIE。住院总费用中位数为31375美元,各手术技术组之间相似。MIE与术中费用较高相关,但与总住院费用无关。多变量分析显示,出现并发症、年龄增加、美国麻醉医师协会IV级(ASA4)以及术前冠状动脉疾病(CAD)与费用显著增加相关。尽管MIE与较高的手术费用相关,但各手术技术组之间的总住院费用并无差异。术后并发症和严重的术前合并症是食管切除术后住院费用的重要驱动因素。外科医生应根据临床因素而非费用影响来选择技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/5178372/8ee84a39c1d1/MIS2016-7690632.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/5178372/8ee84a39c1d1/MIS2016-7690632.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe8/5178372/8ee84a39c1d1/MIS2016-7690632.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Complications, Not Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique, Are Associated with Increased Cost after Esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后成本增加与并发症有关,而非微创外科技术。
Minim Invasive Surg. 2016;2016:7690632. doi: 10.1155/2016/7690632. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
2
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌:来自胸外科医师协会国家数据库的早期手术结果比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.095. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
3
Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.单中心大样本量研究:开放性与微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的围手术期结局比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Sep;42(3):430-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs031. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
4
The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.胸腔镜与腹腔镜联合手术对可切除食管癌患者根治性食管切除术后肺部并发症的影响
Anticancer Res. 2014 May;34(5):2399-404.
5
Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.单一癌症中心食管癌微创与开放食管切除术的比较研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(4):747-52.
6
The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的个体化手术技术的应用。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 May;143(5):1125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.071.
7
Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.食管癌切除术微创与开放手术对比:文献系统综述
Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):135-46.
8
Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.全微创食管腺癌切除术与杂交食管切除术相比,可减少术后疼痛和肺炎。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4957-4965. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6257-2. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.通过双端口进行的微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术的吻合术,其围手术期结果与开放手术相当。
Indian J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51 Suppl 2:e25-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.151996.
10
Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌不同食管切除术方法的成本与效益
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(7-8):513-517. doi: 10.1177/0218492317731389. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of a deep learning-based identification system for esophageal cancer from CT images.基于深度学习的 CT 图像食管癌识别系统的性能。
Esophagus. 2021 Jul;18(3):612-620. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00826-0. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Factors associated with the costs of hospitalization after esophagectomy: a retrospective observational study at a three-tertiary cancer hospital in China.食管癌切除术后住院费用的相关因素:中国一家三级甲等肿瘤医院的回顾性观察研究
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Oct;12(10):5970-5979. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2770.
3
Preoperative exercise to improve fitness in patients undergoing complex surgery for cancer of the lung or oesophagus (PRE-HIIT): protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative β-Blocker Therapy.
JAMA. 2015;313(24):2486-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3086.
2
Effect of laparoscopic surgery on health care utilization and costs in patients who undergo colectomy.腹腔镜手术对接受结肠切除术患者的医疗保健利用和成本的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2015 May;150(5):410-5. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3171.
3
Perioperative aspirin management after POISE-2: some answers, but questions remain.POISE-2 后围手术期阿司匹林管理:部分答案揭晓,但仍存疑问。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Mar;120(3):570-575. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000589.
术前运动改善肺癌或食管癌复杂手术患者的健康状况(PRE-HIIT):一项随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06795-4.
4
Imaging findings of complications after thoracic surgery.胸部手术后并发症的影像学表现。
Jpn J Radiol. 2019 Mar;37(3):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s11604-018-00806-y. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
5
The Cost of Complications Following Major Resection of Malignant Neoplasia.恶性肿瘤广泛切除术治疗后并发症的成本。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Nov;22(11):1976-1986. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3850-6. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.微创食管切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的成本效益
World J Surg. 2018 Aug;42(8):2522-2529. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4501-5.
4
Outcomes in the management of esophageal cancer.食管癌的治疗结果。
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;110(5):599-610. doi: 10.1002/jso.23759. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
5
Minimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancer.食管癌的微创外科治疗。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;28(1):41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
6
The influence of complications on the costs of complex cancer surgery.并发症对复杂癌症手术成本的影响。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120(7):1035-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28527. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
7
Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.微创与开放性食管癌切除术的成本效益比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;20(12):3732-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3103-6. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
8
Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications.杂交微创食管切除术对主要术后肺部并发症的影响。
Br J Surg. 2012 Nov;99(11):1547-53. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8931.
9
Open and laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy: a prospective comparative study.开放和腹腔镜辅助食管切除术:一项前瞻性对比研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Feb;43(2):268-73. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs314. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
10
Accordion severity grading system: assessment of relationship between costs, length of hospital stay, and survival in patients with complications after esophagectomy for cancer.风琴式严重程度分级系统:评估癌症患者食管切除术后并发症的成本、住院时间和生存率之间的关系。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Sep;215(3):331-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.04.030. Epub 2012 Jun 8.