University of Surrey.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jan;146(1):41-62. doi: 10.1037/xge0000243.
Drawing together social psychologists' concerns with equality and cognitive psychologists' concerns with scientific inference, 6 studies (N = 841) showed how implicit category norms make the generation and test of hypothesis about race highly asymmetric. Having shown that Whiteness is the default race of celebrity actors (Study 1), Study 2 used a variant of Wason's (1960) rule discovery task to demonstrate greater difficulty in discovering rules that require specifying that race is shared by White celebrity actors than by Black celebrity actors. Clues to the Whiteness of White actors from analogous problems had little effect on hypothesis formation or rule discovery (Studies 3 and 4). Rather, across Studies 2 and 4 feedback about negative cases-non-White celebrities-facilitated the discovery that White actors shared a race, whether participants or experimenters generated the negative cases. These category norms were little affected by making White actors' Whiteness more informative (Study 5). Although participants understood that discovering that White actors are White would be harder than discovering that Black actors are Black, they showed limited insight into the information contained in negative cases (Study 6). Category norms render some identities as implicit defaults, making hypothesis formation and generalization about real social groups asymmetric in ways that have implications for scientific reasoning and social equality. (PsycINFO Database Record
将社会心理学家对平等的关注和认知心理学家对科学推理的关注结合起来,6 项研究(N=841)表明,内隐类别规范如何使关于种族的假设产生和检验变得高度不对称。在研究 1 中表明,白人是名人演员的默认种族后,研究 2 使用了沃森(Wason)(1960)规则发现任务的变体,证明了发现需要指定种族由白人名人演员共享的规则比发现需要指定种族由黑人名人演员共享的规则更困难。来自类似问题的白人演员的种族线索对白人演员的假设形成或规则发现几乎没有影响(研究 3 和 4)。相反,在研究 2 和 4 中,关于负面案例(非白人名人)的反馈促进了发现白人演员共享一个种族,无论参与者还是实验者生成了负面案例。这些类别规范在使白人演员的种族信息更加明显时(研究 5)几乎没有受到影响。尽管参与者明白发现白人演员是白人会比发现黑人演员是黑人更难,但他们对负面案例中包含的信息几乎没有洞察力(研究 6)。类别规范使某些身份成为隐含的默认身份,使得关于真实社会群体的假设形成和概括变得不对称,这对科学推理和社会平等都有影响。