• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知性别与政治倾向:2020 年美国民主党总统初选期间的社交媒体现场实验。

Perceived gender and political persuasion: a social media field experiment during the 2020 US Democratic presidential primary election.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, USA.

Department of Statistics, Duke University, Durham, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 28;13(1):14051. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39359-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-39359-0
PMID:37640702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10462641/
Abstract

Women have less influence than men in a variety of settings. Does this result from stereotypes that depict women as less capable, or biased interpretations of gender differences in behavior? We present a field experiment that-unbeknownst to the participants-randomized the gender of avatars assigned to Democrats using a social media platform we created to facilitate discussion about the 2020 Primary Election. We find that misrepresenting a man as a woman undermines his influence, but misrepresenting a woman as a man does not increase hers. We demonstrate that men's higher resistance to being influenced-and gendered word use patterns-both contribute to this outcome. These findings challenge prevailing wisdom that women simply need to behave more like men to overcome gender discrimination and suggest that narrowing the gap will require simultaneous attention to the behavior of people who identify as women and as men.

摘要

在各种情况下,女性的影响力都不如男性。这是因为刻板印象认为女性能力较弱,还是因为对行为中的性别差异存在有偏见的解释?我们进行了一项现场实验,参与者并不知道,我们使用一个社交媒体平台随机改变了分配给民主党的虚拟形象的性别,该平台旨在促进关于 2020 年初选的讨论。我们发现,将一个男性描述成女性会削弱他的影响力,但将一个女性描述成男性并不会增加她的影响力。我们证明,男性更难被影响,以及性别化的用词模式,都促成了这一结果。这些发现挑战了一种流行观点,即女性只需表现得更像男性就能克服性别歧视,并表明缩小差距需要同时关注那些自认为是女性和男性的人的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/884c06cc9390/41598_2023_39359_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/3513ac048b53/41598_2023_39359_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/e73104dceae6/41598_2023_39359_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/b30d39a420d0/41598_2023_39359_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/78f697a759cd/41598_2023_39359_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/76a55da09d7a/41598_2023_39359_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/884c06cc9390/41598_2023_39359_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/3513ac048b53/41598_2023_39359_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/e73104dceae6/41598_2023_39359_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/b30d39a420d0/41598_2023_39359_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/78f697a759cd/41598_2023_39359_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/76a55da09d7a/41598_2023_39359_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/10462641/884c06cc9390/41598_2023_39359_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived gender and political persuasion: a social media field experiment during the 2020 US Democratic presidential primary election.感知性别与政治倾向:2020 年美国民主党总统初选期间的社交媒体现场实验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 28;13(1):14051. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39359-0.
2
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
3
Part of the gender gap in voting for Democrats arises because a higher proportion of women than men voters are Black.投票给民主党的性别差距部分源于选民中女性比男性黑人比例更高。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 20;120(25):e2221910120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221910120. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Masculinity in the doctor's office: Masculinity, gendered doctor preference and doctor-patient communication.医生办公室中的男性气质:男性气质、性别化的医生偏好与医患沟通。
Prev Med. 2016 Mar;84:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.12.008. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
5
"Cat Ladies" and "Mama's Boys": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Gendered Discrimination and Stereotypes of Single Women and Single Men."单身女性和单身男性的性别歧视与刻板印象:混合方法分析。"
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Feb;50(2):314-328. doi: 10.1177/01461672231203123. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Factors associated with gender equality among church-going young men in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a cross-sectional study.与金沙萨教会男青年性别平等相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Dec 11;16(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0707-7.
8
Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations.霸权男性气质预测了 2016 年和 2020 年的投票和候选人评价。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 12;118(2). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020589118.
9
The Use of Social Media as a Persuasive Platform to Facilitate Nutrition and Health Behavior Change in Young Adults: Web-Based Conversation Study.社交媒体作为一种有说服力的平台,用于促进年轻人的营养和健康行为改变:基于网络的对话研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 18;24(5):e28063. doi: 10.2196/28063.
10
Content analysis of UK newspaper and online news representations of women's and men's 'binge' drinking: a challenge for communicating evidence-based messages about single-episodic drinking?英国报纸及在线新闻中关于女性和男性“狂饮”的内容分析:在传播关于单次饮酒的循证信息方面面临的挑战?
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 27;6(12):e013124. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013124.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media.社交媒体的社会驱动因素和算法机制。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Sep;19(5):735-748. doi: 10.1177/17456916231185057. Epub 2023 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.性别刻板印象已经发生了变化:1946 年至 2018 年美国民意调查的跨时间元分析。
Am Psychol. 2020 Apr;75(3):301-315. doi: 10.1037/amp0000494. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
2
Lean in messages increase attributions of women's responsibility for gender inequality.向女性传达“lean in”信息会增加其对性别不平等的责任感。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Dec;115(6):974-1001. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000129.
3
Women's visibility in academic seminars: Women ask fewer questions than men.
女性在学术研讨会上的可见度:女性提问少于男性。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0202743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202743. eCollection 2018.
4
On the failure to notice that White people are White: Generating and testing hypotheses in the celebrity guessing game.注意不到白人是白人:在名人猜测游戏中生成和检验假设。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jan;146(1):41-62. doi: 10.1037/xge0000243.
5
Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.自主的女性和共有的领导力:角色期望如何赋予女性高层领导者优势。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):221-35. doi: 10.1037/a0018204.
6
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.对女性领导者偏见的角色一致性理论。
Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):573-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573.