Beckmann Michael, Thompson Rachel, Miller Yvette, Prosser Samantha J, Flenady Vicki, Kumar Sailesh
Mater Health Services, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brisbane, Australia; Mater Research Institute - The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, United States.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.032. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
To describe and examine the EXIT (EXperiences of Induction Tool), and report on the experience of women undergoing PGE2 vaginal gel IOL, who were participants in a randomized controlled trial comparing early amniotomy with repeat-PGE2.
Following an evening dose of PGE2 vaginal gel, 245 women with live singleton term pregnancies were randomized to amniotomy or repeat-PGE2. Women's experience of IOL was a secondary outcome measure, assessed using the self-report EXIT administered by phone at 7-9days post-partum. The 10-item EXIT assessed women's experiences in multiple domains using a 5-point agreement scale. Principal components analysis with orthogonal varimax rotation was undertaken to examine the scale structure. Internal consistency, face, content, construct and discriminant validity were also assessed.
The final 3-component solution comprised 8 of the 10 EXIT items, explained 76.1% of the variance and had a good fit to model (p<0.001). The three resulting components were representative of women's experience of the time taken to give birth, discomfort with IOL, and subsequent contractions. The items loading to each component showed good internal consistency for time taken to give birth (α=0.88), discomfort with IOL (α=0.78), and experience of subsequent contractions (α=0.87). Women in the repeat-PGE2 group reported a less favorable experience with the time taken to give birth (mean (SD): 3.5 (1.4) vs 3.9 (1.2); p=0.04) and more discomfort with IOL (2.9 (1.1) vs 2.5 (1.0); p=0.04) compared to women in the amniotomy group. At the individual item level, women in the amniotomy group responded more positive about the time taken to have their baby (median (IQR): 4 (3-5) vs 3 (2-5); p<0.01); and less negative to the question about the number of vaginal examinations (2 (1-3) vs 2 (1-4); p=0.05).
The EXIT shows promise as an instrument for assessing women's experience of IOL. Women undergoing PGE2 vaginal gel IOL reports a more positive experience with an early amniotomy rather than with repeat-PGE2.
描述并检验引产体验工具(EXIT),并报告参与比较早期人工破膜与重复使用前列腺素E2(PGE2)阴道凝胶引产的随机对照试验的女性的引产体验。
在晚间给予PGE2阴道凝胶后,245名单胎足月活产孕妇被随机分为人工破膜组或重复使用PGE2组。女性的引产体验是次要结局指标,在产后7 - 9天通过电话进行自我报告EXIT评估。EXIT的10个项目使用5点同意量表评估女性在多个领域的体验。采用具有正交旋转的主成分分析来检验量表结构。还评估了内部一致性、表面效度、内容效度、结构效度和区分效度。
最终的三成分解决方案包含EXIT的10个项目中的8个,解释了76.1%的方差,且与模型拟合良好(p<0.001)。产生的三个成分分别代表了女性对分娩所需时间的体验、引产不适以及随后的宫缩情况。加载到每个成分的项目在分娩所需时间(α = 0.88)、引产不适(α = 0.78)和随后宫缩体验(α = 0.87)方面显示出良好的内部一致性。与人工破膜组女性相比,重复使用PGE2组女性报告的分娩所需时间体验较差(均值(标准差):3.5(1.4)对3.9(1.2);p = 0.04),引产不适更多(2.9(1.1)对2.5(1.0);p = 0.04)。在单个项目层面,人工破膜组女性对分娩所需时间的反应更积极(中位数(四分位间距):4(3 - 5)对3(2 - 5);p<0.01);对阴道检查次数问题的负面反应更少(2(1 - 3)对2(1 - 4);p = 0.05)。
EXIT有望成为评估女性引产体验的工具。接受PGE2阴道凝胶引产的女性报告称,早期人工破膜的体验比重复使用PGE2更积极。