• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[肿瘤性食管切除与重建:开放手术、杂交手术、微创手术还是机器人手术?]

[Oncologic esophageal resection and reconstruction : Open, hybrid, minimally invasive or robotic?].

作者信息

Gockel I, Lorenz D

机构信息

Klinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Deutschland.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2017 Jun;88(6):496-502. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0364-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00104-016-0364-1
PMID:28058494
Abstract

Minimally invasive resections are increasingly employed in oncologic surgery for esophageal carcinoma. The new German S3 guideline states that esophagectomy, as well as reconstruction of the esophagus, can be performed minimally invasively or in combination with open techniques (hybrid). However, the current value of different techniques - ranging from complete minimally invasive esophagectomy over hybrid to robotic surgery - remains unregarded.This review provides a critical comparison of these techniques based on current evidence. Minimally invasive procedures of oncologic esophageal resection are safe in experienced hands and show numerous advantages with regard to postoperative reconvalescence. Laparoscopic gastrolysis with intra-abdominal lymphadenectomy and muscle sparing as well as anterolateral mini-thoracotomy (also via VATS as single-port technique) as a hybrid method also result in a relevant reduction of postoperative mortality and offer the possibility of extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy, which requires a high level of expertise when performed thoracoscopically. At present, robotic esophagectomy is applied in only a few clinics in Germany. A lack of evidence based on studies for esophageal surgery, as well as high acquisition and operating costs of the robotic system, have to be taken into account.

摘要

微创切除术在食管癌的肿瘤外科手术中应用越来越广泛。新的德国S3指南指出,食管切除术以及食管重建可以通过微创方式进行,也可以与开放技术(混合手术)相结合。然而,从完全微创食管切除术到混合手术再到机器人手术等不同技术的当前价值仍未得到重视。本综述基于现有证据对这些技术进行了批判性比较。肿瘤性食管切除的微创操作在经验丰富的医生手中是安全的,并且在术后康复方面具有诸多优势。腹腔镜下胃松解术联合腹腔内淋巴结清扫和保留肌肉,以及作为混合手术方法的前外侧小切口开胸术(也可通过单孔技术的电视辅助胸腔镜手术进行),也能显著降低术后死亡率,并提供扩大纵隔淋巴结清扫的可能性,而胸腔镜下进行该操作需要高水平的专业技能。目前,机器人食管切除术在德国仅在少数几家诊所应用。必须考虑到缺乏针对食管手术的研究证据,以及机器人系统的高昂购置和操作成本。

相似文献

1
[Oncologic esophageal resection and reconstruction : Open, hybrid, minimally invasive or robotic?].[肿瘤性食管切除与重建:开放手术、杂交手术、微创手术还是机器人手术?]
Chirurg. 2017 Jun;88(6):496-502. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0364-1.
2
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.机器人辅助微创食管切除术
Chirurg. 2017 Jan;88(Suppl 1):7-11. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0200-7.
3
Robotic Esophagectomy for Cancer: Early Results and Lessons Learned.机器人辅助食管癌切除术治疗癌症:早期结果与经验教训
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Spring;28(1):160-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
4
Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.非开胸入路机器人根治性食管癌切除术与传统开胸手术相比的短期疗效
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Jul;29(5):429-34. doi: 10.1111/dote.12345. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
5
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma.机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌。
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):193-199. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0644-2. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
6
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与微创食管切除术治疗可切除食管腺癌的随机对照试验(ROBOT-2 试验)。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08780-x.
7
A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.完全微创与开放 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的前瞻性比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Apr;26(3):263-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01356.x. Epub 2012 May 23.
8
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
9
[Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].[机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术的短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):995-998.
10
Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: Evolution and evidence.微创与机器人辅助食管切除术:进展与证据
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;114(6):731-735. doi: 10.1002/jso.24398. Epub 2016 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The dawning of perioperative care in esophageal cancer.食管癌围手术期护理的曙光。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Oct;9(10):3488-3492. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.07.
2
[Endoscopic and surgical treatment of early gastric and esophageal carcinoma].早期胃癌和食管癌的内镜及手术治疗
Chirurg. 2017 Dec;88(12):997-1004. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0543-8.

本文引用的文献

1
[Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. German version].[机器人辅助微创食管切除术。德文版]
Chirurg. 2016 Aug;87(8):635-42. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0239-5.
2
Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) feasibility study and pilot trial.比较开放手术与微创手术治疗食管癌的食管切除术:ROMIO(随机食管切除术:微创或开放)可行性研究和试点试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jun;20(48):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta20480.
3
Survival following video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.
电视辅助胸腔镜与开放性食管癌切除术的生存率比较
J BUON. 2016 Mar-Apr;21(2):427-33.
4
Minimally Invasive Techniques and Hybrid Operations for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌的微创技术与杂交手术
Viszeralmedizin. 2015 Oct;31(5):331-6. doi: 10.1159/000438661. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
5
Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization Reduces Postoperative Mortality After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A French Nationwide Study.腹腔镜胃游离术降低食管癌手术后的术后死亡率:一项法国全国性研究。
Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):817-22; discussion 822-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001470.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Z Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov;53(11):1288-347. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107381. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
7
Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.微创食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的疗效比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Mar;87(3):165-170. doi: 10.1111/ans.13334. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
8
Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis.胸腔镜与杂交食管切除术的早期结果:倾向评分匹配的比较分析
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1073-81. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
Extent of Lymphadenectomy and Prognosis After Esophageal Cancer Surgery.食管癌手术后淋巴结清扫范围与预后
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):32-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2611.
10
Muscle sparing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy.食管癌的保留肌肉开胸术:与后外侧开胸术的比较
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):807-14. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1240-1. Epub 2015 Aug 27.