Junn J C, Baugnon K L, Lacayo E A, Hudgins P A, Patel M R, Magliocca K R, Corey A S, El-Deiry M, Wadsworth J T, Beitler J J, Saba N F, Liu Y, Aiken A H
From the Departments of Imaging Sciences (J.C.J., K.L.B., P.A.H., A.S.C., A.H.A.).
Department of Radiology (E.A.L.), Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Feb;38(2):364-370. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4993. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
Extrinsic tongue muscle invasion in oral cavity cancer upstages the primary tumor to a T4a. Despite this American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criterion, no studies have investigated the accuracy or prognostic importance of radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion, the feasibility of standardizing extrinsic tongue muscle invasion reporting, or the degree of agreement across different disciplines: radiology, surgery, and pathology. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement among radiology, surgery, and pathology for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion and to determine the imaging features most predictive of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion with surgical/pathologic confirmation.
Thirty-three patients with untreated primary oral cavity cancer were included. Two head and neck radiologists, 3 otolaryngologists, and 1 pathologist prospectively evaluated extrinsic tongue muscle invasion.
Fourteen of 33 patients had radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion; however, only 8 extrinsic tongue muscle invasions were confirmed intraoperatively. Pathologists were unable to determine extrinsic tongue muscle invasion in post-formalin-fixed samples. Radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion had 100% sensitivity, 76% specificity, 57% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value with concurrent surgical-pathologic evaluation of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion as the criterion standard. On further evaluation, the imaging characteristic most consistent with surgical-pathologic evaluation positive for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion was masslike enhancement.
Evaluation of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion is a subjective finding for all 3 disciplines. For radiology, masslike enhancement of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion most consistently corresponded to concurrent surgery/pathology evaluation positive for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion. Intraoperative surgical and pathologic evaluation should be encouraged to verify radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion to minimize unnecessary upstaging. Because this process is not routine, imaging can add value by identifying those cases most suspicious for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion, thereby prompting this more detailed evaluation by surgeons and pathologists.
口腔癌侵犯舌外肌会将原发肿瘤分期提升至T4a期。尽管有美国癌症联合委员会的这一分期标准,但尚无研究调查放射学上舌外肌侵犯的准确性或预后重要性、标准化舌外肌侵犯报告的可行性,或不同学科(放射学、外科学和病理学)之间的一致程度。本研究的目的是评估放射学、外科学和病理学在舌外肌侵犯评估方面的一致性,并确定最能预测经手术/病理证实的舌外肌侵犯的影像学特征。
纳入33例未经治疗的原发性口腔癌患者。两名头颈放射科医生、三名耳鼻喉科医生和一名病理学家对舌外肌侵犯进行前瞻性评估。
33例患者中有14例存在放射学上的舌外肌侵犯;然而,术中仅证实8例存在舌外肌侵犯。病理学家无法在福尔马林固定后的样本中确定舌外肌侵犯情况。以舌外肌侵犯的同期手术-病理评估作为标准对照时,放射学舌外肌侵犯的敏感性为100%,特异性为76%,阳性预测值为57%,阴性预测值为100%。进一步评估发现,与手术-病理评估阳性的舌外肌侵犯最一致的影像学特征是肿块样强化。
对于所有这三个学科而言,舌外肌侵犯的评估都是主观的。对于放射学来说,舌外肌侵犯的肿块样强化与同期手术/病理评估阳性的舌外肌侵犯最为一致。应鼓励术中进行手术和病理评估以核实放射学舌外肌侵犯情况,从而尽量减少不必要的分期提升。由于这一过程并非常规操作,影像学可通过识别那些最可疑存在舌外肌侵犯的病例来增加价值,从而促使外科医生和病理学家进行更详细的评估。