• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提取刻板印象的评价:刻板印象内容结构的双因素模型

Extracting the Evaluations of Stereotypes: Bi-factor Model of the Stereotype Content Structure.

作者信息

Sayans-Jiménez Pablo, Cuadrado Isabel, Rojas Antonio J, Barrada Juan R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.

Center for the Study of Migration and Intercultural Relations, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 4;8:1692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01692. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01692
PMID:29085313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5649216/
Abstract

Stereotype dimensions-competence, morality and sociability-are fundamental to studying the perception of other groups. These dimensions have shown moderate/high positive correlations with each other that do not reflect the theoretical expectations. The explanation for this (e.g., halo effect) undervalues the utility of the shared variance identified. In contrast, in this work we propose that this common variance could represent the global evaluation of the perceived group. Bi-factor models are proposed to improve the internal structure and to take advantage of the information representing the shared variance among dimensions. Bi-factor models were compared with first order models and other alternative models in three large samples (300-309 participants). The relationships among the global and specific bi-factor dimensions with a global evaluation dimension (measured through a semantic differential) were estimated. The results support the use of bi-factor models rather than first order models (and other alternative models). Bi-factor models also show a greater utility to directly and more easily explore the stereotype content including its evaluative content.

摘要

刻板印象维度——能力、道德和社交性——是研究对其他群体认知的基础。这些维度之间呈现出中度/高度的正相关,这与理论预期不符。对此的解释(如光环效应)低估了所识别出的共同方差的效用。相比之下,在本研究中我们提出,这种共同方差可能代表了对被感知群体的整体评价。我们提出了双因素模型来改善内部结构,并利用代表维度间共同方差的信息。在三个大样本(300 - 309名参与者)中,将双因素模型与一阶模型及其他替代模型进行了比较。估计了全局和特定双因素维度与一个全局评价维度(通过语义差异测量)之间的关系。结果支持使用双因素模型而非一阶模型(及其他替代模型)。双因素模型在直接且更轻松地探索刻板印象内容(包括其评价性内容)方面也显示出更大的效用。

相似文献

1
Extracting the Evaluations of Stereotypes: Bi-factor Model of the Stereotype Content Structure.提取刻板印象的评价:刻板印象内容结构的双因素模型
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 4;8:1692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01692. eCollection 2017.
2
Is it advisable to include negative attributes to assess the stereotype content? Yes, but only in the morality dimension.纳入负面属性以评估刻板印象内容是否可取?答案是肯定的,但仅限于道德维度。
Scand J Psychol. 2017 Apr;58(2):170-178. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12346. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
3
A spontaneous stereotype content model: Taxonomy, properties, and prediction.自发刻板印象内容模型:分类、特性与预测。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Dec;123(6):1243-1263. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000312. Epub 2022 May 5.
4
Forecasting the Primary Dimension of Social Perception: Symbolic and Realistic Threats Together Predict Warmth in the Stereotype Content Model.预测社会认知的主要维度:在刻板印象内容模型中,象征性和现实性威胁共同预测热情程度。
Soc Psychol (Gott). 2015;46(1):36-45. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000219. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
5
Intergroup attitudes and contact between Spanish and immigrant-background adolescents using network analysis.使用网络分析研究西班牙裔和移民背景青少年的群体间态度和接触情况。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0271376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271376. eCollection 2022.
6
Stereotype content and morality: How competence and warmth arise from morally significant interactions.刻板印象内容与道德:有意义的道德互动如何产生能力与温暖。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Oct;57(4):834-854. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12262. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
7
Meeting a nice asylum seeker: Intergroup contact changes stereotype content perceptions and associated emotional prejudices, and encourages solidarity-based collective action intentions.遇到友善的寻求庇护者:群体间接触改变了刻板印象内容感知和相关的情感偏见,并鼓励基于团结的集体行动意愿。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;58(3):668-690. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12304. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
8
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.社会刻板印象与偏见的发展性群体间理论。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:39-89. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2.
9
Cross-dimension-ambivalent in-group stereotypes: the moderating roles of social context of stereotype endorsement and in-group identification.跨维度矛盾的内群体刻板印象:刻板印象认同的社会背景和内群体认同的调节作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2007 Oct;147(5):543-54. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.147.5.543-555.
10
Mapping Ethnic Stereotypes and Their Antecedents in Russia: The Stereotype Content Model.描绘俄罗斯的种族刻板印象及其成因:刻板印象内容模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping Ethnic Stereotypes and Their Antecedents in Russia: The Stereotype Content Model.描绘俄罗斯的种族刻板印象及其成因:刻板印象内容模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Forecasting the Primary Dimension of Social Perception: Symbolic and Realistic Threats Together Predict Warmth in the Stereotype Content Model.预测社会认知的主要维度:在刻板印象内容模型中,象征性和现实性威胁共同预测热情程度。
Soc Psychol (Gott). 2015;46(1):36-45. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000219. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
2
Is it advisable to include negative attributes to assess the stereotype content? Yes, but only in the morality dimension.纳入负面属性以评估刻板印象内容是否可取?答案是肯定的,但仅限于道德维度。
Scand J Psychol. 2017 Apr;58(2):170-178. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12346. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
3
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation.
道德品质在人际知觉和评价中占主导地位。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jan;106(1):148-68. doi: 10.1037/a0034726. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
4
The importance of moral construal: moral versus non-moral construal elicits faster, more extreme, universal evaluations of the same actions.道德构建的重要性:道德构建与非道德构建会引发对相同行为更快、更极端、更普遍的评价。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048693. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
5
You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation.你想给人留下好印象?那就诚实吧!道德特质主导着群体印象的形成。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;51(1):149-66. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
6
A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs.层次结构构造教程。
J Pers. 2012 Aug;80(4):796-846. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
7
Perceiving others' personalities: examining the dimensionality, assumed similarity to the self, and stability of perceiver effects.感知他人的个性:考察感知者效应的维度、与自我的假设相似性和稳定性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):520-34. doi: 10.1037/a0017057.
8
Self-categorization with a novel mixed-race group moderates automatic social and racial biases.与一个新的混血群体进行自我分类会缓和自动的社会和种族偏见。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;35(3):321-35. doi: 10.1177/0146167208327743. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
9
Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups.群体美德:道德(相对于能力和社交性)在对内群体的积极评价中的重要性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Aug;93(2):234-49. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234.
10
Attitudes and evaluations: a social cognitive neuroscience perspective.态度与评价:社会认知神经科学视角
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Feb 2.