Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Feb;13(2):178-182.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
This article updates the Calcium Hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease and brain aging on the basis of emerging evidence since 1994 (The present article, with the subtitle "New evidence for a central role of Ca in neurodegeneration," includes three appendices that provide context and further explanations for the rationale for the revisions in the updated hypothesis-the three appendices are as follows: Appendix I "Emerging concepts on potential pathogenic roles of [Ca]," Appendix II "Future studies to validate the central role of dysregulated [Ca] in neurodegeneration," and Appendix III "Epilogue: towards a comprehensive hypothesis.") (Marx J. Fresh evidence points to an old suspect: calcium. Science 2007; 318:384-385). The aim is not only to re-evaluate the original key claims of the hypothesis with a critical eye but also to identify gaps in knowledge required to validate relevant claims and delineate additional studies and/or data that are needed. Some of the key challenges for this effort included examination of questions regarding (1) the temporal and spatial relationships of molecular mechanisms that regulate neuronal calcium ion (Ca), (2) the role of changes in concentration of calcium ion [Ca] in various subcellular compartments of neurons, (3) how alterations in Ca signaling affect the performance of neurons under various conditions, ranging from optimal functioning in a healthy state to conditions of decline and deterioration in performance during aging and in disease, and (4) new ideas about the contributions of aging, genetic, and environmental factors to the causal relationships between dysregulation of [Ca] and the functioning of neurons (see Appendices I and II). The updated Calcium Hypothesis also includes revised postulates that are intended to promote further crucial experiments to confirm or reject the various predictions of the hypothesis (see Appendix III).
这篇文章基于 1994 年以来出现的新证据,更新了阿尔茨海默病和大脑衰老的钙假说。(本文副标题为“钙在神经退行性变中的中心作用的新证据”,包括三个附录,为修订后的假说提供了背景和进一步的解释——这三个附录如下:附录 I“关于[Ca]潜在致病作用的新兴概念”、附录 II“验证[Ca]失调在神经退行性变中的核心作用的未来研究”和附录 III“结语:迈向全面假说”)(Marx J. 新证据指向旧嫌疑人:钙。科学 2007;318:384-385)。目的不仅是用批判的眼光重新评估该假说的原始关键主张,而且还要确定验证相关主张所需的知识空白,并确定需要进行哪些额外的研究和/或收集哪些数据。这项工作的一些关键挑战包括检查以下问题:(1)调节神经元钙离子(Ca)的分子机制的时间和空间关系;(2)神经元不同亚细胞区室中钙离子[Ca]浓度变化的作用;(3)Ca 信号转导的改变如何影响神经元在各种条件下的性能,从健康状态下的最佳功能到衰老和疾病期间性能下降和恶化的条件;(4)关于衰老、遗传和环境因素对[Ca]失调与神经元功能之间因果关系的影响的新想法(见附录 I 和 II)。更新后的钙假说还包括修订后的假设,旨在促进进一步的关键实验,以确认或拒绝该假说的各种预测(见附录 III)。