Lee Jong-Beom, Ahn Ho-Young, Lee Hong-Jae, Yang Ji-Ho, Yi Jin-Seok, Lee Il-Woo
Department of Neurosurgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine (Nursing), The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):1-7. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.0404.002. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
The diagnosis of shunt malfunction can be challenging since neuroimaging results are not always correlated with clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a simple, minimally invasive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lumbar tapping test that predicts shunt under-drainage in hydrocephalus patients.
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological features of 48 patients who underwent routine CSF lumbar tapping after ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) operation using a programmable shunting device. We compared shunt valve opening pressure and CSF lumbar tapping pressure to check under-drainage.
The mean pressure difference between valve opening pressure and CSF lumbar tapping pressure of all patients were 2.21±24.57 mmHO. The frequency of CSF lumbar tapping was 2.06±1.26 times. Eighty five times lumbar tapping of 41 patients showed that their VPS function was normal which was consistent with clinical improvement and decreased ventricle size on computed tomography scan. The mean pressure difference in these patients was -3.69±19.20 mmHO. The mean frequency of CSF lumbar tapping was 2.07±1.25 times. Fourteen cases of 10 patients revealed suspected VPS malfunction which were consistent with radiological results and clinical symptoms, defined as changes in ventricle size and no clinical improvement. The mean pressure difference was 38.07±23.58 mmHO. The mean frequency of CSF lumbar tapping was 1.44±1.01 times. Pressure difference greater than 35 mmHO was shown in 2.35% of the normal VPS function group (2 of 85) whereas it was shown in 64.29% of the suspected VPS malfunction group (9 of 14). The difference was statistically significant (=0.000001). Among 10 patients with under-drainage, 5 patients underwent shunt revision. The causes of the shunt malfunction included 3 cases of proximal occlusion and 2 cases of distal obstruction and valve malfunction.
Under-drainage of CSF should be suspected if CSF lumbar tapping pressure is 35 mmHO higher than the valve opening pressure and shunt malfunction evaluation or adjustment of the valve opening pressure should be made.
由于神经影像学结果并不总是与临床结果相关,分流故障的诊断可能具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估一种简单、微创的脑脊液(CSF)腰椎穿刺试验在预测脑积水患者分流引流不足方面的有效性。
我们回顾性分析了48例使用可编程分流装置进行脑室腹腔分流(VPS)手术后接受常规脑脊液腰椎穿刺的患者的临床和放射学特征。我们比较了分流阀开启压力和脑脊液腰椎穿刺压力,以检查引流不足情况。
所有患者的阀开启压力与脑脊液腰椎穿刺压力之间的平均压差为2.21±24.57 mmHO。脑脊液腰椎穿刺频率为2.06±1.26次。41例患者进行了85次腰椎穿刺,结果显示其VPS功能正常,这与临床改善以及计算机断层扫描显示脑室大小减小一致。这些患者的平均压差为-3.69±19.20 mmHO。脑脊液腰椎穿刺的平均频率为2.07±1.25次。10例患者中的14例显示疑似VPS故障,这与放射学结果和临床症状一致,定义为脑室大小变化且无临床改善。平均压差为38.07±23.58 mmHO。脑脊液腰椎穿刺的平均频率为1.44±1.01次。正常VPS功能组中2.35%(85例中的2例)的压差大于35 mmHO,而疑似VPS故障组中64.29%(14例中的9例)出现这种情况。差异具有统计学意义(=0.000001)。在10例引流不足的患者中,5例接受了分流修正。分流故障的原因包括近端阻塞3例、远端阻塞2例以及阀门故障。
如果脑脊液腰椎穿刺压力比阀开启压力高35 mmHO以上,则应怀疑脑脊液引流不足,并应进行分流故障评估或调整阀开启压力。