Raza Qaisar, Snijder Marieke B, Seidell Jacob C, Peters Ron J G, Nicolaou Mary
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, Kamer O534, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jan 6;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2352-4.
Ethnic differences regarding the percent of non-communicable diseases have been shown in Asia but the studies on Asian subgroups living in the western countries regarding percent of cardiovascular risk factors and dietary intakes have been scarce. Therefore we compared the percent of cardiovascular risk factors and dietary intakes between Javanese Surinamese who are originally from Indonesia and South-Asian Surinamese who are originally from India.
Cross-sectional baseline data of the HELIUS (Healthy Life in an Urban Setting) study were used, including data of 2935 Surinamese participants (197 of Javanese and 2738 of South-Asian origin) out of which 1160 participants (78 Javanese and 1082 South-Asian) additionally reported dietary intake data. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the two ethnic groups regarding cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia; in addition, dietary intake of foods like vegetables, red meat, fruit, high fibre foods, low fibre foods, high fat and low fat dairy products, chicken and sugar sweetened beverages were also compared between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for age and sex when comparing the two groups.
South-Asian Surinamese had a significantly higher percent of abdominal obesity (OR 2.44; CI 1.66-3.57), cardiovascular disease (OR 2.55; CI 1.48-4.35) and diabetes (OR 2.77; CI 1.67-4.60) as compared with Javanese Surinamese after adjustment for age and sex. The percent of obesity (BMI), hypertension, and lipids was not significantly different between the ethnic groups. Javanese Surinamese had a significantly higher intake of red meat and a significantly lower intake of dairy products as compared with South-Asian Surinamese. Intakes of vegetables, grains, fish, fruits, tea and coffee did not significantly differ between the ethnic groups. Both groups showed intake of considerable amount of sugar sweetened beverages.
Public health practitioners in the Netherlands and elsewhere in the world should take into account the ethnic subgroup differences within the broader groups like Asians when developing interventions related to health among ethnic minorities.
在亚洲,非传染性疾病的比例存在种族差异,但针对生活在西方国家的亚洲亚群体的心血管危险因素比例和饮食摄入量的研究却很匮乏。因此,我们比较了祖籍印度尼西亚的爪哇族苏里南人和祖籍印度的南亚裔苏里南人心血管危险因素的比例和饮食摄入量。
使用了HELIUS(城市健康生活)研究的横断面基线数据,包括2935名苏里南参与者的数据(197名爪哇族和2738名南亚裔),其中1160名参与者(78名爪哇族和1082名南亚裔)还报告了饮食摄入数据。采用描述性统计方法比较了两个种族在心血管疾病、糖尿病、肥胖症、高血压和高胆固醇血症方面的情况;此外,还比较了两组在蔬菜、红肉、水果、高纤维食物、低纤维食物、高脂肪和低脂肪乳制品、鸡肉以及含糖饮料等食物的饮食摄入量。在比较两组时,使用二元逻辑回归分析对年龄和性别进行了调整。
在对年龄和性别进行调整后,与爪哇族苏里南人相比,南亚裔苏里南人的腹部肥胖比例(比值比2.44;可信区间1.66 - 3.57)、心血管疾病比例(比值比2.55;可信区间1.48 - 4.35)和糖尿病比例(比值比2.77;可信区间1.67 - 4.60)显著更高。两个种族在肥胖(体重指数)、高血压和血脂方面的比例没有显著差异。与南亚裔苏里南人相比,爪哇族苏里南人的红肉摄入量显著更高,而乳制品摄入量显著更低。两个种族在蔬菜、谷物、鱼类、水果、茶和咖啡的摄入量上没有显著差异。两组都摄入了大量的含糖饮料。
荷兰及世界其他地方的公共卫生从业者在制定与少数民族健康相关的干预措施时,应考虑到亚洲等更广泛群体中的种族亚群体差异。