• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究中使用的测量工具的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research.

作者信息

Kimberlin Carole L, Winterstein Almut G

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070364.

DOI:10.2146/ajhp070364
PMID:19020196
Abstract

PURPOSE

Issues related to the validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Key indicators of the quality of a measuring instrument are the reliability and validity of the measures. The process of developing and validating an instrument is in large part focused on reducing error in the measurement process. Reliability estimates evaluate the stability of measures, internal consistency of measurement instruments, and interrater reliability of instrument scores. Validity is the extent to which the interpretations of the results of a test are warranted, which depends on the particular use the test is intended to serve. The responsiveness of the measure to change is of interest in many of the applications in health care where improvement in outcomes as a result of treatment is a primary goal of research. Several issues may affect the accuracy of data collected, such as those related to self-report and secondary data sources. Self-report of patients or subjects is required for many of the measurements conducted in health care, but self-reports of behavior are particularly subject to problems with social desirability biases. Data that were originally gathered for a different purpose are often used to answer a research question, which can affect the applicability to the study at hand.

CONCLUSION

In health care and social science research, many of the variables of interest and outcomes that are important are abstract concepts known as theoretical constructs. Using tests or instruments that are valid and reliable to measure such constructs is a crucial component of research quality.

摘要

目的

对研究中使用的测量工具的有效性和可靠性相关问题进行综述。

总结

测量工具质量的关键指标是测量的可靠性和有效性。开发和验证一个工具的过程在很大程度上聚焦于减少测量过程中的误差。可靠性估计评估测量的稳定性、测量工具的内部一致性以及工具分数的评分者间可靠性。有效性是指对测试结果的解释具有正当性的程度,这取决于该测试预期的特定用途。在医疗保健的许多应用中,测量对变化的反应性是令人感兴趣的,在这些应用中,作为治疗结果的改善是研究的主要目标。几个问题可能会影响所收集数据的准确性,比如那些与自我报告和二手数据源相关的问题。医疗保健中的许多测量都需要患者或受试者的自我报告,但行为的自我报告特别容易受到社会期望偏差问题的影响。最初为不同目的收集的数据常常被用来回答一个研究问题,这可能会影响其对手头研究的适用性。

结论

在医疗保健和社会科学研究中,许多重要的感兴趣变量和结果都是被称为理论构想的抽象概念。使用有效且可靠的测试或工具来测量此类构想是研究质量的关键组成部分。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research.研究中使用的测量工具的有效性和可靠性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070364.
2
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
3
How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies.患者满意度数据的有效性和可靠性如何?对195项研究的分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Aug;11(4):319-28. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319.
4
The Trojan Lifetime Champions Health Survey: development, validity, and reliability.特洛伊终身冠军健康调查:开发、效度与信度
J Athl Train. 2015 Apr;50(4):407-18. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.2.10. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
5
Errors of measurement affecting the reliability and validity of data acquired from self-assessed quality of life.
Scand J Caring Sci. 1990;4(1):29-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.1990.tb00004.x.
6
Quality of care in an IVF programme from a patient's perspective: development of a validated instrument.从患者角度评估 IVF 项目的护理质量:验证性工具的开发。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Mar;29(3):534-47. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det421. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
7
Measurement of dyspnea and quality of life in advanced lung disease.晚期肺部疾病中呼吸困难及生活质量的测量
Clin Chest Med. 1997 Sep;18(3):457-69. doi: 10.1016/s0272-5231(05)70394-4.
8
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
9
Reliability and validity in a nutshell.信度与效度概述。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Dec;18(23):3237-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02939.x.
10
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Bulgarian version of the Liverpool Adverse Event Profile.《利物浦不良事件概况》保加利亚语版本的翻译、跨文化调适与验证
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Oct;39:88-91. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.08.124. Epub 2014 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and content validation of an instrument to assess the prevalence of psychiatric medication use among dental students at Brazilian universities.评估巴西大学生牙科专业学生精神科药物使用患病率工具的开发与内容效度验证
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Sep 10;25(1):1249. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07843-y.
2
Health and Social Care Managers' Competence in Knowledge Management Instrument: Development and Validation.健康与社会护理管理者在知识管理工具方面的能力:开发与验证
Nurs Res Pract. 2025 Aug 22;2025:9617966. doi: 10.1155/nrp/9617966. eCollection 2025.
3
Application of construal level theory in identifying factors affecting individual decision-making in implementing flood protection measures in rural areas of Iran.
解释水平理论在识别影响伊朗农村地区实施防洪措施中个体决策的因素方面的应用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):29873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15847-3.
4
Development and validation of tool to assess respectful maternity care practices among healthcare providers.评估医疗服务提供者中尊重孕产妇护理实践的工具的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1007. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13155-0.
5
Physician and Patient Dissatisfaction with Outpatient Pre-Screening Triage in Public Dental Hospitals: Scope and Strategies for Improvement.公立牙科医院门诊预筛查分诊中医生和患者的不满:范围及改进策略
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;13(14):1672. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141672.
6
Mindfulness and self-rated performance among novice athletes in China: a sequential mediating role of flow and cognitive anxiety.中国新手运动员的正念与自评表现:心流与认知焦虑的序列中介作用
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 9;16:1436321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1436321. eCollection 2025.
7
Evaluating interprofessional primary care teams in high-income countries: A scoping review protocol on the conceptualization and measurement of team functioning, effectiveness, performance and collaboration in primary care.评估高收入国家的跨专业初级保健团队:关于初级保健中团队功能、有效性、绩效和协作的概念化与测量的范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0328708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328708. eCollection 2025.
8
Development and validation of a Wechat mini app-based screening tool (eR-BFAS) for early detection of Parkinson's disease.基于微信小程序的帕金森病早期检测筛查工具(eR-BFAS)的开发与验证
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Jul 9;37(1):209. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03113-5.
9
Assessing the psychometric properties and validating the Portuguese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in Portugal.评估葡萄牙版INSPIRE员工支持个人康复量表的心理测量特性并进行效度验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07060-3.
10
Validation of the Perceived Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence (PEDIA) Scale Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender and Nonbinary Persons: Cross-Sectional Study.男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性关系者、跨性别者和非二元性别者中抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性感知障碍量表(PEDIA)的验证:横断面研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Jun 27;11:e67005. doi: 10.2196/67005.