deVries H A, Brodowicz G R, Robertson L D, Svoboda M D, Schendel J S, Tichy A M, Tichy M W
Ergonomics. 1989 Aug;32(8):967-77. doi: 10.1080/00140138908966858.
The test for estimating physical working capacity at the fatigue threshold (PWCft), previously validated for young men, was evaluated for use with elderly men and women. A sample of 27 volunteer subjects (67.6 +/- 5.6 years, 11 male, 16 female) was divided into three matched groups: (1) controls (n = 10), (2) low intensity (70% PWCft) training group (n = 10) and (3) high intensity (85% PWCft) training group (n = 7). The subjects were tested for PWCft before and after 10 weeks of exercise training on cycle ergometers (30 min/day, 3 days/week). Controls did not exercise but met once a week for a health lecture. No significant pre-test to post-test change was noted in the mean PWCft of the control group (78.8-78.5 W); low intensity training resulted in 29.8% improvement in PWCft (81.0 to 105.0 W); and the high intensity group realized an improvement of 38.4% (83.6-115.7 W). One-way ANOVA indicated that the gains made by each of the groups were significantly different (p less than 0.01). Post hoc analysis revealed that the gains made by each exercise training group were significantly greater than controls (p less than 0.05) with no significant difference between high and low intensity groups. Reproducibility of the PWCft was excellent (R = 0.976). Since RPE averaged 14.2 at PWCft and 64% of subjects provided useful data, this test appears to be useful for evaluating the fitness of the elderly.
之前已针对年轻男性验证过的用于评估疲劳阈值时身体工作能力(PWCft)的测试,现针对老年男性和女性进行评估。27名志愿者受试者样本(年龄67.6±5.6岁,男性11名,女性16名)被分为三个匹配组:(1)对照组(n = 10),(2)低强度(70% PWCft)训练组(n = 10)和(3)高强度(85% PWCft)训练组(n = 7)。在进行10周的自行车测力计运动训练(每天30分钟,每周3天)前后,对受试者进行PWCft测试。对照组不运动,但每周参加一次健康讲座。对照组的平均PWCft在测试前到测试后没有显著变化(78.8 - 78.5瓦);低强度训练使PWCft提高了29.8%(从81.0瓦提高到105.0瓦);高强度组实现了38.4%的提高(从83.6瓦提高到115.7瓦)。单因素方差分析表明,每组取得的进步有显著差异(p小于0.01)。事后分析显示,每个运动训练组取得的进步均显著大于对照组(p小于0.05),高强度组和低强度组之间无显著差异。PWCft的可重复性极佳(R = 0.976)。由于在PWCft时主观用力程度(RPE)平均为14.2,且64%的受试者提供了有用数据,该测试似乎对评估老年人的健康状况有用。