Takahashi Yoshihide, Iwai Shinsuke, Yamashita Syu, Masumura Mayumi, Suzuki Masahito, Yabe Kento, Sato Yasuhiro, Hirao Kenzo, Isobe Mitsuaki
Department of Cardiology, Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Apr;28(4):375-382. doi: 10.1111/jce.13163. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Identification of wavefront propagation pattern during AF remains challenging in ablation procedures. We sought to test a novel combination of a new mapping technology called Ripple Map and high-density mapping to distinguish focal and reentrant activation during atrial fibrillation (AF).
Subjects were patients undergoing ablation for persistent AF. If AF remained after isolation of the pulmonary veins, the left atrium (LA) was mapped by a high-density mapping catheter for later analysis, after which ablation was continued using a conventional stepwise approach. After the procedure, electrograms from the high-density mapping catheter were analyzed using Ripple Map, which is a new feature in the CARTO®3, and type of activation on ≥3 consecutive AF cycles was determined. High-density mapping was performed on 569 sites in 45 patients (13 ± 3 sites per patient). AF wavefront propagation determined by Ripple Map was in good agreement with analysis of manual annotation of bipolar electrograms. Ripple Map's representation of wavefront activation pattern, which could include local as well as far-field activity, allowed us to identify focal activation in 64 (11%) sites and 1 (0.2%) reentrant activation site. Radiofrequency delivery in atrial regions with activation sites identified as focal by Ripple Map resulted in termination of AF more often than regions without focal activation (22% vs. 7%, P = 0.015).
This study demonstrated that Ripple Map enabled quick identification of AF wavefront activation pattern, potentially being helpful for determining ablation targets in persistent AF.
在房颤消融手术中,识别房颤期间的波前传播模式仍然具有挑战性。我们试图测试一种名为“涟漪图”的新标测技术与高密度标测的新型组合,以区分房颤(AF)期间的局灶性和折返性激动。
研究对象为接受持续性房颤消融治疗的患者。如果在肺静脉隔离后仍存在房颤,则使用高密度标测导管对左心房(LA)进行标测以供后续分析,之后采用传统的逐步方法继续进行消融。术后,使用CARTO®3中的一项新功能“涟漪图”分析来自高密度标测导管的电图,并确定≥3个连续房颤周期的激动类型。对45例患者的569个部位进行了高密度标测(每位患者13±3个部位)。通过“涟漪图”确定的房颤波前传播与双极电图的手动标注分析结果高度一致。“涟漪图”对波前激动模式的呈现,包括局部和远场活动,使我们能够识别出64个(11%)局灶性激动部位和1个(0.2%)折返性激动部位。在被“涟漪图”识别为局灶性激动部位的心房区域进行射频消融,比未发现局灶性激动的区域更常导致房颤终止(22%对7%,P=0.015)。
本研究表明,“涟漪图”能够快速识别房颤波前激动模式,可能有助于确定持续性房颤的消融靶点。