Huang Jonathan, Rayfield Lael, Broecker Bruce, Cerwinka Wolfgang, Kirsch Andrew, Scherz Hal, Smith Edwin, Elmore James
Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Jun;13(3):291.e1-291.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
Established criteria to assist surgeons in deciding between a one- or two-stage operation for severe hypospadias are lacking. While anatomical features may preclude some surgical options, the decision to approach severe hypospadias in a one- or two-stage fashion is generally based on individual surgeon preference. This decision has been described as a dilemma as outcomes range widely and there is lack of evidence supporting the superiority of one approach over the other.
The aim of this study is to determine whether the GMS hypospadias score may provide some guidance in choosing the surgical approach used for correction of severe hypospadias.
GMS scores were preoperatively assigned to patients having primary surgery for hypospadias. Those patients having surgery for the most severe hypospadias were selected and formed the study cohort. The records of these patients were reviewed and pertinent data collected. Complications requiring further surgery were assessed and correlated with the GMS score and the surgical technique used for repair (one-stage vs. two-stage).
Eighty-seven boys were identified with a GMS score (range 3-12) of 10 or higher. At a mean follow-up of 22 months the overall complication rate for the cohort after final planned surgery was 39%. For intended one-stage procedures (n = 48) an acceptable result was achieved with one surgery for 28 patients (58%), with two surgeries for 14 (29%), and with three to five surgeries for six (13%). For intended two-stage procedures (n = 39) an acceptable result was achieved with two surgeries for 26 patients (67%), three surgeries for eight (21%), and four surgeries for three (8%). Two other patients having two-stage surgery required seven surgeries to achieve an acceptable result. Complication rates are summarized in the Table. The complication rates for GMS 10 patients were similar (27% and 33%, p = 0.28) for one- and two-stage repairs, respectively. GMS 11 patients having a one-stage repair had a significantly higher complication rate (69%) than those having a two-stage repair (29%) (p = 0.04). GMS 12 patients had the highest complication rate with a one-stage repair (80%) compared with a complication rate of 37% when a two-stage repair was used (p = 0.12).
Guidelines to help standardize the surgical approach to severe hypospadias are needed. Staged surgery for GMS 11 and 12 patients may result in a lower complication rate but may not reduce the number of surgeries required for an acceptable result. Although further study is needed, the GMS score may be helpful for establishing such criteria.
目前缺乏既定标准来协助外科医生决定对重度尿道下裂采取一期手术还是二期手术。虽然解剖特征可能会排除一些手术选择,但对于重度尿道下裂采取一期还是二期手术的决定通常基于外科医生的个人偏好。由于手术结果差异很大且缺乏证据支持一种方法优于另一种方法,这一决定一直被视为一个难题。
本研究的目的是确定GMS尿道下裂评分是否可为选择用于矫正重度尿道下裂的手术方法提供一些指导。
术前为接受尿道下裂一期手术的患者分配GMS评分。选择那些接受最严重尿道下裂手术的患者组成研究队列。回顾这些患者的记录并收集相关数据。评估需要进一步手术的并发症,并将其与GMS评分及用于修复的手术技术(一期手术与二期手术)相关联。
确定了87名GMS评分(范围为3 - 12)为10或更高的男孩。在平均22个月的随访中,最终计划手术后该队列的总体并发症发生率为39%。对于预期的一期手术(n = 48),28名患者(58%)通过一次手术获得了可接受的结果,14名患者(29%)通过两次手术获得了可接受的结果,6名患者(13%)通过三至五次手术获得了可接受的结果。对于预期的二期手术(n = 39),26名患者(67%)通过两次手术获得了可接受的结果,8名患者(21%)通过三次手术获得了可接受的结果,3名患者(8%)通过四次手术获得了可接受的结果。另外两名接受二期手术的患者需要七次手术才能获得可接受的结果。并发症发生率总结在表中。GMS评分为10的患者一期和二期修复的并发症发生率分别相似(27%和33%,p = 0.28)。接受一期修复的GMS评分为11的患者并发症发生率(69%)显著高于接受二期修复的患者(29%)(p = 0.04)。GMS评分为12的患者一期修复的并发症发生率最高(80%),而采用二期修复时并发症发生率为37%(p = 0.12)。
需要有助于规范重度尿道下裂手术方法的指南。对GMS评分为11和12的患者进行分期手术可能会降低并发症发生率,但可能不会减少获得可接受结果所需的手术次数。虽然需要进一步研究,但GMS评分可能有助于建立此类标准。