• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享领导力提升团队创新性:机制及其边界条件

Shared Leadership Improves Team Novelty: The Mechanism and Its Boundary Condition.

作者信息

Sun Xiaomin, Jie Yuan, Wang Yilu, Xue Gang, Liu Yan

机构信息

Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University Beijing, China.

School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 19;7:1964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01964. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01964
PMID:28066289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5165241/
Abstract

Previous research has revealed the significant impact of shared leadership on team creativity, yet the mechanism underlying this relationship has rarely been investigated. The current research examined how shared leadership influenced team creativity (novelty and usefulness) across 3 studies using both long-term project teams and temporal task teams in the laboratory. The results showed that shared leadership enhanced the novelty dimension of team creativity by improving constructive controversy. Furthermore, team goal orientation moderated this effect. The indirect effect of constructive controversy holds for teams with learning goal orientation but not for those with performance goal orientation. Such patterns were not found in the usefulness dimension of team creativity.

摘要

以往的研究揭示了共享领导对团队创造力的重大影响,但这种关系背后的机制却很少被探究。当前的研究通过3项研究,考察了共享领导如何影响长期项目团队和实验室中的临时任务团队的团队创造力(新颖性和实用性)。结果表明,共享领导通过改善建设性争议提高了团队创造力的新颖性维度。此外,团队目标导向调节了这种效应。建设性争议的间接效应适用于具有学习目标导向的团队,而不适用于具有绩效目标导向的团队。在团队创造力的实用性维度中未发现此类模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0629/5165241/646452b7a9d8/fpsyg-07-01964-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0629/5165241/4e4bb2e8f261/fpsyg-07-01964-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0629/5165241/646452b7a9d8/fpsyg-07-01964-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0629/5165241/4e4bb2e8f261/fpsyg-07-01964-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0629/5165241/646452b7a9d8/fpsyg-07-01964-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Shared Leadership Improves Team Novelty: The Mechanism and Its Boundary Condition.共享领导力提升团队创新性:机制及其边界条件
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 19;7:1964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01964. eCollection 2016.
2
An integration-and-learning perspective on gender diversity in self-managing teams: The roles of learning goal orientation and shared leadership.从整合与学习的角度看待自我管理团队中的性别多样性:学习目标导向和共享领导的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Sep;107(9):1628-1639. doi: 10.1037/apl0000942. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
3
Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness: An Investigation of Whether and When in Engineering Design Teams.共享领导力与团队效能:对工程设计团队中共享领导力的存在与否及何时存在的调查
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 18;11:569198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569198. eCollection 2020.
4
Interteam Cooperation and Competition and Boundary Activities: The Cross-Level Mediation of Team Goal Orientations.团队间合作与竞争与边界活动:团队目标取向的跨层次中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 31;16(15):2738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152738.
5
A moderated mediation model linking transactive memory system and social media with shared leadership and team innovation.中介调节模型将记忆系统和社交媒体与共享领导和团队创新联系起来。
Scand J Psychol. 2021 Aug;62(4):625-637. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12733. Epub 2021 May 14.
6
Investigating the pathways between swift trust and team creativity among nursing student teams in Taiwan: A moderated mediation model.台湾护理专业学生团队中快速信任与团队创造力之间的路径探究:一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 7;21(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01118-3.
7
Shared leadership in multiteam systems: how cockpit and cabin crews lead each other to safety.多团队系统中的共享领导:驾驶舱和客舱机组如何相互领导以确保安全。
Hum Factors. 2014 Mar;56(2):270-86. doi: 10.1177/0018720813488137.
8
Moderating effects of task interdependence on interaction behaviours and creativity for nursing students on interdisciplinary teams.调节任务相互依赖性对跨学科团队中护理学生的互动行为和创造力的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jan;78(1):131-141. doi: 10.1111/jan.14961. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
9
When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator.教育专业化异质性何时与研发团队的创造力相关?变革型领导作为调节变量。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1709-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709.
10
Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance.领导者谦逊与团队创造力:团队信息共享、心理安全感和权力距离的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Mar;103(3):313-323. doi: 10.1037/apl0000277. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Team interaction behaviors correlates with team creativity among nursing students: Canonical correlation and moderation analyses.护理专业学生团队互动行为与团队创造力的相关性:典型相关分析与调节效应分析
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 16;23(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02158-7.
2
In search of mediators of leadership behavior to Team Creativity in Team Start-ups.探寻团队创业中领导行为对团队创造力的中介因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 3;13:951603. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951603. eCollection 2022.
3
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well-being.

本文引用的文献

1
Squeezed in the middle: The middle status trade creativity for focus.处于中间状态:中间状态以专注换取创造力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Oct;109(4):589-603. doi: 10.1037/a0039569. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
2
To drive creativity, add some conformity.
Harv Bus Rev. 2012 Mar;90(3):30.
3
The bias against creativity: why people desire but reject creative ideas.对创造力的偏见:为什么人们渴望但却拒绝创意。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):13-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797611421018. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
集体领导以改善专业实践、医疗保健结果和员工福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 10;10(10):CD013850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013850.pub2.
4
Spontaneous emergence of leadership patterns drives synchronization in complex human networks.自发性领导模式的出现驱动着复杂人际网络中的同步。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 15;11(1):18379. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97656-y.
5
The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Innovation Labs.创新实验室中共享领导力的出现。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 12;12:685167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685167. eCollection 2021.
6
Moderating effects of task interdependence on interaction behaviours and creativity for nursing students on interdisciplinary teams.调节任务相互依赖性对跨学科团队中护理学生的互动行为和创造力的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jan;78(1):131-141. doi: 10.1111/jan.14961. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
7
Majority Decision-Making Works Best Under Conditions of Leadership Ambiguity and Shared Task Representations.多数决决策在领导模糊和共享任务表征的条件下效果最佳。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 14;12:519295. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.519295. eCollection 2021.
8
Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness: An Investigation of Whether and When in Engineering Design Teams.共享领导力与团队效能:对工程设计团队中共享领导力的存在与否及何时存在的调查
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 18;11:569198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569198. eCollection 2020.
9
How Leader-Member Exchange Affects Creative Performance: An Examination From the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory.领导-成员交换如何影响创新绩效:基于自我决定理论的考察
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 28;11:573793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573793. eCollection 2020.
4
The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: choosing between creativity and impact.个体创意产生后的创意选择:在创造力和影响力之间做出选择。
Br J Psychol. 2010 Feb;101(Pt 1):47-68. doi: 10.1348/000712609X414204. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
5
Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: the role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions.理解组织工作团队中状态目标导向的出现:领导力和多层次氛围认知的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1084-95. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1084.
6
Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models.组织中的团队:从输入-过程-输出模型到IMOI模型。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:517-43. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250.
7
Management team learning orientation and business unit performance.管理团队的学习导向与业务部门绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Jun;88(3):552-60. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.552.
8
Achievement goals and optimal motivation: testing multiple goal models.成就目标与最佳动机:对多种目标模型的检验
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 May;80(5):706-22.
9
Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: the role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience.社会心理因素对创造性表现的影响:信息性和控制性预期评价及榜样作用的角色
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jan;84(1):1-22. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2918.
10
Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation.考试焦虑与趋近和回避成就动机的层次模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Apr;76(4):628-44. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.4.628.