Lin Hongmei, Chen Yuhchyau, Shi Anhui, Pandya Kishan J, Yu Rong, Yuan Yannan, Li Jiancheng, Li Hang, Wang Yingjie, Xia Tingyi, Feng Linchun, Ma Huimin, Geng Jianhao, Zhu Guangying
Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center , Rochester, NY , USA.
Front Oncol. 2016 Dec 20;6:260. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00260. eCollection 2016.
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) but is associated with poor chest tumor control. Here, we report results of a randomized phase 3 study comparing two CCRT regimens in improving chest tumor control by low-dose paclitaxel chemoradiation for LA-NSCLC.
Due to the logistics of local referral pattern, the study was designed to enroll patients with stage III LA-NSCLC who had completed 2-4 cycles of full-dose chemotherapy. One hundred thirty four were randomized to either Arm 1 [paclitaxel at 15 mg/m, three times per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) for 6 weeks, = 74] or Arm 2 (weekly paclitaxel at 45 mg/m for 6 weeks, = 60). Chest radiotherapy was 60-70 Gy in standard fractionation. Response rate was the primary endpoint, with recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the secondary endpoint.
From March 2006 to February 2013, 71 patients completed Arm 1 treatment and 59 completed Arm 2 treatment. The response rate for Arm 1 was significantly higher (83.1%) than Arm 2 (54.2%) (=0.001). RFS was superior in Arm 1: median 14.6 vs. 9.4 months, = 0.005, Hazard ratio (HR) 1.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20, 2.90]. Overall survival was not significantly different: median 32.6 months in Arm 1 vs. 31.3 months in Arm 2, = 0.91, HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.55, 1.70). Toxicity was significantly lower in Arm 1 for Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia/neutropenia ( < 0.001).
Pulsed low-dose paclitaxel CCRT resulted in significantly better RFS and tumor response rate, and less hematologic toxicities than weekly CCRT for LA-NSCLC.
同步放化疗(CCRT)是局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(LA-NSCLC)的标准治疗方法,但胸部肿瘤控制效果不佳。在此,我们报告一项随机3期研究的结果,该研究比较了两种CCRT方案,通过低剂量紫杉醇同步放化疗改善LA-NSCLC的胸部肿瘤控制情况。
由于当地转诊模式的后勤因素,该研究旨在纳入已完成2-4周期全剂量化疗的III期LA-NSCLC患者。134例患者被随机分为1组[紫杉醇15mg/m²,每周三次(周一、周三和周五),共6周,n=74]或2组(每周紫杉醇45mg/m²,共6周,n=60)。胸部放疗采用标准分割,剂量为60-70Gy。缓解率为主要终点,无复发生存期(RFS)为次要终点。
2006年3月至2013年2月,71例患者完成了1组治疗,59例患者完成了2组治疗。1组的缓解率显著高于2组(83.1%对54.2%,P=0.001)。1组的RFS更优:中位生存期分别为14.6个月和9.4个月,P=0.005,风险比(HR)为1.87[95%置信区间(CI)1.20,2.90]。总生存期无显著差异:1组中位生存期为32.6个月,2组为31.3个月,P=0.91,HR为0.97(95%CI 0.55,1.70)。1组3/4级白细胞减少/中性粒细胞减少的毒性显著更低(P<0.001)。
对于LA-NSCLC,与每周一次的CCRT相比,脉冲低剂量紫杉醇CCRT导致显著更好的RFS和肿瘤缓解率,以及更低的血液学毒性。