• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗抑郁药的长期急性期治疗:8 周及以上的随机、安慰剂对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Long-Term Acute-Phase Treatment With Antidepressants, 8 Weeks and Beyond: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne Medical School, Cologne, Germany.

Charité University Medicine, St Hedwig-Krankenhaus, Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jan/Feb;79(1). doi: 10.4088/JCP.15r10545.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.15r10545
PMID:28068463
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In clinical practice, acute antidepressant treatment is often applied for several months until remission is achieved. However, data on treatment outcomes beyond 8 weeks are sparse and no systematic review exists to date. This study aims at assessing efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants compared to placebo in acute treatment at and beyond 8 weeks.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched through March 2014 using generic terms for depressive and affective disorders combined with generic terms for individual drugs and placebo.

STUDY SELECTION

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of 8 weeks or more comparing antidepressant monotherapy to placebo in adult patients with acute depressive disorder.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction and synthesis followed guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration. All data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers. Primary outcome was standardized mean difference (SMD) between antidepressant and placebo; secondary outcomes were response, remission, and dropouts.

RESULTS

Of 6,043 articles screened, we selected 104 studies that met criteria and included 35,052 patients. Active treatment was statistically significantly superior to placebo, with consistent effect sizes (SMD [95% CL]) after 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks: 0.27 (0.24, 0.30), 0.34 (0.25, 0.43), 0.24 (0.09, 0.40), 0.31 (0.12, 0.51), and 0.34 (0.18, 0.50), respectively. Results remained stable across secondary outcomes and subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Effect sizes of antidepressant monotherapy compared to placebo seem to be stable over 6 months. These results challenge the assumption that long-term antidepressant effects are due to the natural course of the disorder rather than to a pharmacologic effect.

摘要

目的

在临床实践中,通常会应用急性抗抑郁治疗数月,直到达到缓解。然而,目前关于 8 周后治疗效果的数据很少,且尚无系统综述。本研究旨在评估抗抑郁药与安慰剂在 8 周及以上急性治疗中的疗效和耐受性。

数据来源

通过使用通用术语(抑郁和情感障碍)与单个药物和安慰剂的通用术语,系统地检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO 和 CENTRAL 数据库,检索时间截至 2014 年 3 月。

研究选择

在患有急性抑郁症的成年患者中,将抗抑郁药单药治疗与安慰剂进行比较,进行 8 周或更长时间的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。

数据提取

数据提取和综合遵循 Cochrane 协作组的指南。所有数据均由 2 位审查员独立提取。主要结局是抗抑郁药与安慰剂之间的标准化均数差(SMD);次要结局是反应、缓解和脱落。

结果

在筛选出的 6043 篇文章中,我们选择了符合标准的 104 项研究,共纳入 35052 名患者。与安慰剂相比,积极治疗具有统计学上的显著优势,且在 8、12、16、20 和 24 周时的疗效大小(SMD [95%CI])一致:0.27(0.24,0.30)、0.34(0.25,0.43)、0.24(0.09,0.40)、0.31(0.12,0.51)和 0.34(0.18,0.50)。次要结局和亚组及敏感性分析的结果均保持稳定。

结论

与安慰剂相比,抗抑郁药单药治疗的疗效大小在 6 个月内似乎稳定。这些结果挑战了长期抗抑郁效果归因于疾病自然病程而非药物作用的假设。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Acute-Phase Treatment With Antidepressants, 8 Weeks and Beyond: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials.抗抑郁药的长期急性期治疗:8 周及以上的随机、安慰剂对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jan/Feb;79(1). doi: 10.4088/JCP.15r10545.
2
Trajectories of Acute Antidepressant Efficacy: How Long to Wait for Response? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled Acute Treatment Trials.急性抗抑郁疗效的轨迹:需要等待多久才能有反应?长期、安慰剂对照急性治疗试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 May/Jun;79(3). doi: 10.4088/JCP.17r11470.
3
Combining Antidepressants vs Antidepressant Monotherapy for Treatment of Patients With Acute Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.联合抗抑郁药与抗抑郁药单药治疗急性抑郁症患者的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):300-312. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.4313.
4
Switching the Antidepressant After Nonresponse in Adults With Major Depression: A Systematic Literature Search and Meta-Analysis.成人重度抑郁症患者抗抑郁药治疗无应答后换药:系统文献检索和荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jan/Feb;79(1). doi: 10.4088/JCP.16r10749.
5
A meta-analysis of early sustained response rates between antidepressants and placebo for the treatment of major depressive disorder.一项关于抗抑郁药与安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症早期持续缓解率的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;26(1):56-60. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000195042.62724.76.
6
Antidepressants for major depressive disorder and dysthymic disorder in patients with comorbid alcohol use disorders: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials.抗抑郁药治疗伴有酒精使用障碍的重性抑郁障碍和恶劣心境障碍患者:安慰剂对照随机试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;72(8):1144-51. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06217. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
7
Correlation between different levels of placebo response rate and clinical trial outcome in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis.安慰剂反应率不同水平与重度抑郁症临床试验结局的相关性:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;73(10):1300-6. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07485.
8
Antidepressants for the acute treatment of bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗双相抑郁的急性期:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;72(2):156-67. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09r05385gre. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
9
Demographic variables, design characteristics, and effect sizes of randomized, placebo-controlled, monotherapy trials of major depressive disorder and bipolar depression.人口统计学变量、设计特征和主要抑郁障碍和双相抑郁的随机、安慰剂对照、单药治疗试验的效应大小。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 May;77(5):e619-24. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14r09767.
10
Efficacy of antidepressants for late-life depression: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of placebo-controlled randomized trials.抗抑郁药治疗老年期抑郁症的疗效:安慰剂对照随机试验的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;72(12):1660-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r06531.

引用本文的文献

1
A real-world analysis of antidepressant medications in US veterans aged 60 years and older: a comparative analysis.美国60岁及以上退伍军人抗抑郁药物的真实世界分析:一项比较分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Feb;14(2):e240187. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0187. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions.难治性抑郁症:定义、患病率、检测、管理及研究性干预措施。
World Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;22(3):394-412. doi: 10.1002/wps.21120.
3
The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses.
成人精神障碍的心理治疗和药物治疗效果:近期荟萃分析的伞状综述和荟萃分析评估
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):133-145. doi: 10.1002/wps.20941.
4
Low-dose lithium against dementia.低剂量锂盐预防痴呆症。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2020 Aug 3;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40345-020-00188-z.
5
Should antidepressants be used for major depressive disorder?抗抑郁药是否应用于治疗重度抑郁症?
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Aug;25(4):130. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111238. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
6
DNA Methylation as a Biomarker of Treatment Response Variability in Serious Mental Illnesses: A Systematic Review Focused on Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, and Major Depressive Disorder.DNA 甲基化作为严重精神疾病治疗反应变异性的生物标志物:一项侧重于双相情感障碍、精神分裂症和重度抑郁症的系统评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 4;19(10):3026. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103026.
7
Expression of the PPM1F Gene Is Regulated by Stress and Associated With Anxiety and Depression.PPM1F 基因的表达受应激调节,与焦虑和抑郁有关。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;83(3):284-295. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
8
Outcomes of psychological therapies for prisoners with mental health problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.针对有心理健康问题的囚犯的心理治疗效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Aug;85(8):783-802. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000214. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
9
Using Parameter Constraints to Choose State Structures in Cost-Effectiveness Modelling.使用参数约束选择成本效益建模中的状态结构。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Sep;35(9):951-962. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0501-9.