Skorpik C, Gottlob I, Weghaupt H
Universitäts-Augenklinik, Wien, Austria.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989;227(5):413-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02172890.
Seventeen patients received a posterior chamber lens of PMMA in one eye and a silicone lens (Staar Surgical Co.) in the other. Contrast sensitivity was examined in both eyes in order to detect differences with respect to the material used for lens implantation. An attempt was made to exclude any changes in the eyes that were not due to lens implantation and that might possibly have an influence on the result. A paired T-test was performed for each spatial frequency. No statistically significant difference was found between the two materials with regard to contrast sensitivity.
17名患者一只眼睛植入了聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯后房型人工晶状体,另一只眼睛植入了硅酮人工晶状体(斯塔尔外科公司)。对双眼进行了对比敏感度检查,以检测晶状体植入所用材料方面的差异。试图排除非晶状体植入引起的、可能对结果有影响的眼部任何变化。对每个空间频率进行配对t检验。在对比敏感度方面,两种材料之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。