Suppr超能文献

硅水凝胶人工晶状体患者的对比敏感度

Contrast sensitivity in patients with silicone intraocular lenses.

作者信息

Mäntyjärvi M, Tuppurainen K

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Kuopio, University of Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Ophthalmologica. 1997;211(4):214-8. doi: 10.1159/000310792.

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity in 64 patients aged from 50 to 69 years with an intraocular lens (IOL) was studied. There were 23 eyes with a silicone and 31 eyes with a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) IOL. Ten patients had a silicone IOL in one eye and a PMMA IOL in the other. Contrast sensitivity was examined with the Vistech far vision VCTS 6500 test. The contrast sensitivity test results in silicone and PMMA IOL eyes were in all cpd (cycles per degree) lines significantly worse than in normal eyes except in the 60-year-old group in the 18-cpd line. The contrast sensitivity test results were in all cpd lines better in the silicone IOL eyes than in the PMMA IOL eyes, but it reached significantly only in the 3-cpd line. In the 10 patients with the silicone lens in one and the PMMA lens in the other eye, the test results were also better in the silicone IOL eye; it also reached significance only in the 3-cpd line.

摘要

对64名年龄在50至69岁之间且植入人工晶状体(IOL)的患者的对比敏感度进行了研究。其中23只眼植入了硅胶人工晶状体,31只眼植入了聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)人工晶状体。10名患者一只眼植入硅胶人工晶状体,另一只眼植入PMMA人工晶状体。使用Vistech远视力VCTS 6500测试检查对比敏感度。除了60岁组的18周期/度线外,硅胶人工晶状体眼和PMMA人工晶状体眼的对比敏感度测试结果在所有周期/度线上均显著低于正常眼。在所有周期/度线上,硅胶人工晶状体眼的对比敏感度测试结果均优于PMMA人工晶状体眼,但仅在3周期/度线达到显著差异。在10名一只眼植入硅胶晶状体而另一只眼植入PMMA晶状体的患者中,硅胶人工晶状体眼的测试结果也更好;同样仅在3周期/度线达到显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验