Suppr超能文献

肺静脉起搏期间进行心房标测以检测第二次肺静脉隔离手术中的传导间隙。

Atrial mapping during pulmonary vein pacing to detect conduction gaps in a second pulmonary vein isolation procedure.

作者信息

Barrio-López Maria Teresa, Castellanos Eduardo, Ortiz Mercedes, Arceluz Martín, Lázaro Carla, Salas Jefferson, Madero Sergio, Almendral Jesús

机构信息

Electrophysiology Laboratory and Arrhythmia Unit, Hospital Monteprincipe, Grupo HM Hospitales, University CEU-San Pablo, Madrid, Spain.

Unidad de Electrofisiología, Hospital Madrid Montepríncipe, Avda Monteprincipe, 25 28660 Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;53(2):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0371-x. Epub 2018 May 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Finding the conduction gaps in redo PV isolation procedures is challenging, and several maneuvers have been described. In the present study, we analyze the pace and map (P&M) maneuver [atrial mapping during pulmonary vein (PV) pacing] to locate the gaps in redo PV isolation procedures.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing a second PV isolation procedure at a single institution over a 4-year period were included. For the last 2 years, all the patients (n = 38) studied underwent PV isolation based on the P&M maneuver and were compared to the previous patients (n = 45). The atrial side of the ablation line was mapped with the ablation catheter during PV pacing, and the earliest site was considered a gap site.

RESULTS

Shorter radiofrequency time was required to obtain PV isolation in the P&M group (485 ± 374 vs. 864 ± 544 s; p < 0.001), which remained significant after adjusting for the number of reconnected PVs (p = 0.01). We did not find significant differences in the procedure duration (106 ± 46 vs. 112 ± 53 min; p = 0.57) and arrhythmia recurrence during 1-year follow-up (26.6 vs. 28.9%; p = 0.82) after adjusting for several confounding factors (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.5-3.4; p = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

P&M is a simple maneuver to identify the gaps in ablation lines around the PV. It remains efficacious in redo procedures despite the difficulties in localizing the ablation lines performed in the first procedure. The P&M maneuver reduced the radiofrequency time required to isolate the PV without compromising the efficacy.

摘要

背景

在再次进行肺静脉隔离手术中寻找传导间隙具有挑战性,已有多种操作方法被描述。在本研究中,我们分析了起搏与标测(P&M)操作(肺静脉起搏时进行心房标测)以定位再次肺静脉隔离手术中的间隙。

方法

纳入在4年期间于单一机构接受第二次肺静脉隔离手术的连续患者。在最后2年,所有研究的患者(n = 38)基于P&M操作接受肺静脉隔离,并与先前的患者(n = 45)进行比较。在肺静脉起搏期间,用消融导管对消融线的心房侧进行标测,最早的部位被视为间隙部位。

结果

P&M组获得肺静脉隔离所需的射频时间较短(485±374 vs. 864±544秒;p < 0.001),在调整重新连接的肺静脉数量后仍具有显著性(p = 0.01)。在调整多个混杂因素后(HR 1.32;95% CI 0.5 - 3.4;p = 0.57),我们未发现手术时间(106±46 vs. 112±53分钟;p = 0.57)和1年随访期间心律失常复发率(26.6% vs. 28.9%;p = 0.82)存在显著差异。

结论

P&M操作是一种识别肺静脉周围消融线间隙的简单方法。尽管首次手术中难以定位消融线,但在再次手术中它仍然有效。P&M操作减少了隔离肺静脉所需的射频时间,且不影响疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验