Chen Ray-Jade, Chu Hsi, Tsai Lung-Wen
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan 10;6(1):e004392. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004392.
Relevant clinical studies have been small and have not convincingly demonstrated whether the perioperative initiation of beta-blockers should be considered in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing noncardiac surgery.
In this nationwide propensity score-matched study, we included patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing noncardiac surgery between 2000 and 2011 from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients were classified as beta-blocker and non-beta-blocker cohorts. We further stratified beta-blocker users into cardioprotective beta-blocker (atenolol, bisoprolol, metoprolol, or carvedilol) and other beta-blocker users. To investigate time of initiation of beta-blocker use, initiation time was stratified into 2 periods (>30 and ≤30 days preoperatively). The outcomes of interest were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. After propensity score matching, we identified 50 952 beta-blocker users and 50 952 matched controls. Compared with non-beta-blocker users, cardioprotective beta-blocker users were associated with lower risks of in-hospital (odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.82) and 30-day (odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.81) mortality. Among initiation times, only the use of cardioprotective beta-blockers for >30 days was associated with decreased risk of in-hospital (odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.78) and 30-day (odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.66-0.78) mortality. Of note, use of other beta-blockers for ≤30 days before surgery was associated with increased risk of both in-hospital and 30-day mortality.
The use of cardioprotective beta-blockers for >30 days before surgery was associated with reduced mortality risk, whereas short-term use of beta-blockers was not associated with differences in mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus.
相关临床研究规模较小,尚未令人信服地证明接受非心脏手术的糖尿病患者围手术期是否应使用β受体阻滞剂。
在这项全国性倾向评分匹配研究中,我们纳入了2000年至2011年期间来自台湾国民健康保险研究数据库的接受非心脏手术的糖尿病患者。患者被分为β受体阻滞剂组和非β受体阻滞剂组。我们进一步将β受体阻滞剂使用者分为心脏保护型β受体阻滞剂(阿替洛尔、比索洛尔、美托洛尔或卡维地洛)使用者和其他β受体阻滞剂使用者。为了研究β受体阻滞剂的使用时间,将起始时间分为2个时间段(术前>30天和≤30天)。感兴趣的结局是住院和30天死亡率。经过倾向评分匹配后,我们确定了50952名β受体阻滞剂使用者和50952名匹配对照。与非β受体阻滞剂使用者相比,心脏保护型β受体阻滞剂使用者的住院(比值比0.75,95%CI 0.68-0.82)和30天(比值比0.75,95%CI 0.70-0.81)死亡率风险较低。在起始时间方面,仅术前使用心脏保护型β受体阻滞剂>30天与住院(比值比0.72,95%CI 0.65-0.78)和30天(比值比0.72,95%CI 0.66-0.78)死亡率风险降低相关。值得注意的是,术前≤30天使用其他β受体阻滞剂与住院和30天死亡率风险增加相关。
术前使用心脏保护型β受体阻滞剂>30天与降低死亡风险相关,而短期使用β受体阻滞剂与糖尿病患者的死亡率差异无关。