• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用微轴经皮左心室辅助装置(Impella)进行血流动力学支持可预防高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的急性肾损伤。

Hemodynamic Support With a Microaxial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella) Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

机构信息

From the Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, KY (M.P.F., S.P., T.K., S.D., J.H.L., W.R.); Internal Medicine, Sparks Regional Medical Center, Fort Smith, AR (S.V.P.); Cardiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (B.D.); Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (A.C.); and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (C.R.B.).

出版信息

Circ Res. 2017 Feb 17;120(4):692-700. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309738. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309738
PMID:28073804
Abstract

RATIONALE

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly in those with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The impact of partial hemodynamic support with a microaxial percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) on renal function after high-risk PCI remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that partial hemodynamic support with the Impella 2.5 microaxial pLVAD during high-risk PCI protected against AKI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective, single-center study, we analyzed data from 230 patients (115 consecutive pLVAD-supported and 115 unsupported matched-controls) undergoing high-risk PCI with ejection fraction ≤35%. The primary outcome was incidence of in-hospital AKI according to AKI network criteria. Logistic regression analysis determined the predictors of AKI. Overall, 5.2% (6) of pLVAD-supported patients versus 27.8% (32) of unsupported control patients developed AKI (<0.001). Similarly, 0.9% (1) versus 6.1% (7) required postprocedural hemodialysis (<0.05). Microaxial pLVAD support during high-risk PCI was independently associated with a significant reduction in AKI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence intervals, 0.09-0.31; <0.001). Despite preexisting CKD or a lower ejection fraction, pLVAD support protection against AKI persisted (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence intervals, 0.25-0.83; =0.04 and adjusted odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence intervals, 0.12-0.28; <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Impella 2.5 (pLVAD) support protected against AKI during high-risk PCI. This renal protective effect persisted despite the presence of underlying CKD and decreasing ejection fraction.

摘要

背景

急性肾损伤(AKI)在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中很常见,特别是在左心室射血分数严重降低的患者中。使用微型轴流式经皮左心室辅助装置(pLVAD)进行部分血液动力学支持对高危 PCI 后肾功能的影响尚不清楚。

目的

我们检验了这样一个假设,即在高危 PCI 中使用 Impella 2.5 微型轴流式 pLVAD 进行部分血液动力学支持可预防 AKI。

方法和结果

在这项回顾性、单中心研究中,我们分析了 230 例(115 例连续接受 pLVAD 支持,115 例未接受支持的匹配对照)接受射血分数≤35%的高危 PCI 患者的数据。主要结局是根据 AKI 网络标准评估的住院期间 AKI 的发生率。逻辑回归分析确定了 AKI 的预测因素。总体而言,pLVAD 支持组的患者中有 5.2%(6 例)发生 AKI,而未接受支持组的患者中有 27.8%(32 例)发生 AKI(<0.001)。同样,0.9%(1 例)需要接受术后血液透析,而未接受支持组的患者中有 6.1%(7 例)需要接受血液透析(<0.05)。高危 PCI 期间使用微型轴流式 pLVAD 支持与 AKI 的显著降低独立相关(调整后的优势比,0.13;95%置信区间,0.09-0.31;<0.001)。尽管存在预先存在的 CKD 或较低的射血分数,pLVAD 支持对 AKI 的保护作用仍然存在(调整后的优势比,0.63;95%置信区间,0.25-0.83;=0.04 和调整后的优势比,0.16;95%置信区间,0.12-0.28;<0.001)。

结论

Impella 2.5(pLVAD)支持可预防高危 PCI 中的 AKI。这种肾脏保护作用在存在潜在 CKD 和射血分数降低的情况下仍然存在。

相似文献

1
Hemodynamic Support With a Microaxial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella) Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.采用微轴经皮左心室辅助装置(Impella)进行血流动力学支持可预防高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的急性肾损伤。
Circ Res. 2017 Feb 17;120(4):692-700. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309738. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
2
Impella support and acute kidney injury during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The Global cVAD Renal Protection Study.Impella 辅助支持与高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的急性肾损伤:全球 cVAD 肾脏保护研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 1;95(6):1111-1121. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28400. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
3
High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the TandemHeart and Impella devices: a single-center experience.使用TandemHeart和Impella设备进行高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:单中心经验
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Oct;23(10):417-24.
4
Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and haemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon versus Impella pump: Real-life single-centre preliminary results.接受复杂、高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并使用主动脉内球囊与Impella泵进行血流动力学支持的患者的临床结局:单中心真实世界初步结果
Kardiol Pol. 2022;80(12):1224-1231. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0203. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
Percutaneous left ventricular support for high-risk PCI and cardiogenic shock: who gets what?经皮左心室支持用于高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和心源性休克:谁适合哪种治疗?
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;13(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
6
Outcomes with prophylactic use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in high-risk patients undergoing catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: A propensity-score matched analysis.高危患者行经导管消融治疗瘢痕相关室性心动过速时预防性应用经皮左心室辅助装置的结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Oct;15(10):1500-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 May 10.
7
Indication and short-term clinical outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with microaxial Impella® pump: results from the German Impella® registry.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用微型轴流 Impella®泵的适应证和短期临床结果:德国 Impella®注册研究结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Aug;107(8):653-657. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1230-6. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
8
Minimizing the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and hemodynamic collapse during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device.在慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用经皮左心室辅助装置时,将造影剂诱导的肾病和血流动力学崩溃的风险降至最低。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Sep;19(6):712-716. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
9
Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival.在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者进行无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)之前启动Impella 2.5可提高早期生存率。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Jun;30(3):256-263. doi: 10.1111/joic.12377. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
10
Six months follow-up of protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the microaxial Impella pump: results from the German Impella registry.使用微型轴流式 Impella 泵进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高危患者的 6 个月随访:来自德国 Impella 登记处的结果。
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 May;31(3):237-242. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000824.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Outcomes of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Versus Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.主动脉内球囊反搏与经皮左心室辅助装置在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 1;14(15):5430. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155430.
2
Trends and outcomes of different mechanical circulatory support modalities for refractory cardiogenic shock in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.Takotsubo心肌病难治性心源性休克不同机械循环支持方式的趋势和结果
Am Heart J Plus. 2025 Apr 14;54:100545. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100545. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Short- and long-term outcomes of Impella-protected, high-risk, elective PCI in patients with multivessel coronary disease and low ejection fraction - Polish Impella Registry.
多支冠状动脉疾病和低射血分数患者接受Impella保护的高危择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期和长期结果——波兰Impella注册研究
Cardiol J. 2025;32(3):248-257. doi: 10.5603/cj.103336. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
4
The Role of Hemodynamic Support in High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.血流动力学支持在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用
US Cardiol. 2020 Oct 13;14:e13. doi: 10.15420/usc.2020.18. eCollection 2020.
5
Mechanical circulatory support reduces renal sympathetic nerve activity in an ovine model of acute myocardial infarction.在急性心肌梗死绵羊模型中,机械循环支持可降低肾交感神经活性。
Clin Auton Res. 2025 Apr;35(2):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s10286-024-01086-5. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
6
Early risk predictors of acute kidney injury and short-term survival during Impella support in cardiogenic shock.心源性休克患者使用 Impella 支持期间急性肾损伤和短期生存的早期风险预测因子。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):17484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68376-w.
7
Science of left ventricular unloading.左心室卸载科学。
Perfusion. 2025 May;40(4):818-831. doi: 10.1177/02676591241268389. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
8
Mechanical circulatory support with Impella in percutaneous coronary intervention: current status.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用Impella进行机械循环支持:现状
Am Heart J Plus. 2020 Nov 25;1:100002. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2020.100002. eCollection 2021 Jan.
9
The use of mechanical circulatory support in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: a literature-based review.机械循环支持在择期高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:基于文献的综述
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Feb 9;4(2):oeae007. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae007. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
High-mobility group box 1 and its related receptors: potential therapeutic targets for contrast-induced acute kidney injury.高迁移率族蛋白 B1 及其相关受体:对比剂诱导急性肾损伤的潜在治疗靶点。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jul;56(7):2291-2299. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-03981-2. Epub 2024 Mar 5.