Sattoe J N T, Hilberink S R, van Staa A
Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Sep;43(5):768-773. doi: 10.1111/cch.12436. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
In this short report, we use data from a previous cohort study to explore the relationship between five out of eight consensus indicators for successful transition and patient-reported outcomes in young adulthood.
Data came from a 6-year cohort study that consisted of a survey among 518 young adults with various chronic conditions and a review of their electronic patient records. Associations between five indicators for successful transition and background variables and patient-reported outcomes were explored with Spearman's r. Significant variables were included in stepwise (logistic) regression analyses with transition outcomes as dependent variables.
The indicators relate to some extent to better healthcare-related transition outcomes, but not to autonomy in participation. The explained variance of the models varied from 9.7% to 26.4%. The change in explained variance after adding indicators varied from 2% to 16%.
The challenge of translating the definition of transition into holistic indicators remains. The current consensus indicators are a good start, but there is more to transition than transfer.
在本简短报告中,我们使用先前队列研究的数据,探讨八项成功过渡的共识指标中的五项与青年期患者报告结局之间的关系。
数据来自一项为期6年的队列研究,该研究包括对518名患有各种慢性病的青年成年人进行的调查以及对他们电子病历的审查。使用Spearman's r探讨五项成功过渡指标与背景变量及患者报告结局之间的关联。将显著变量纳入以过渡结局为因变量的逐步(逻辑)回归分析。
这些指标在一定程度上与更好的医疗保健相关过渡结局相关,但与参与自主性无关。模型的解释方差从9.7%到26.4%不等。添加指标后解释方差的变化从2%到16%不等。
将过渡定义转化为整体指标的挑战依然存在。当前的共识指标是一个良好的开端,但过渡不仅仅是转诊。