van Leeuwen Pim J, Kranse Ries, Hakulinen Timo, Hugosson Jonas, Tammela Teuvo L, Ciatto Stefano, Roobol Monique J, Zappa Marco, de Koning Harry J, Bangma Chris H, Moss Sue M, Auvinen Anssi, Schröder Fritz H
MD, PhD., Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
Statistician , Comprehensive Cancer Center the Netherlands (IKNL) , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
J Med Screen. 2013 Mar;20(1):33-38. doi: 10.1258/jms.2013.012026.
Objectives To assess the effect of screening in terms of excess mortality in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Methods A total of 141,578 men aged 55-69 were randomized to systematic screening or usual care in ERSPC sections in Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. The excess number of deaths was defined as the difference between the observed number of deaths in the prostate cancer (PC) patients and the expected number of deaths up to 31 December 2006. The expected number was derived from mortality of all study participants before a diagnosis with PC adjusted for study centre, study arm and study attendance. The excess mortality rates were compared between the two study arms. Results The PC incidence was 9.25 per 1000 person-years in the intervention arm and 5.49 per 1000 person-years in the control arm, relative risk (RR) 1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-1.76). The excess mortality among men with PC was 0.29 per 1000 person-years in the intervention arm and 0.37 per 1000 person-years in the control arm; the RR for excess mortality was 0.77 (95% CI 0.55-1.08). The absolute risk reduction in the excess mortality was 0.08 per 1000 person-years. The overall mortality was not significantly different between the intervention and the control arms of the study: RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.96-1.01). Conclusions Although the reduction in excess mortality was not statistically significant, the between-arm reduction in excess mortality rate was in line with the previously reported 20% reduction in the disease-specific mortality. This finding indicates that the reduction in PC mortality in the ERSPC trial cannot be due to a bias in cause of death adjudication.
目的 在欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)中,评估筛查对超额死亡率的影响。方法 在芬兰、意大利、荷兰和瑞典的ERSPC研究中心,共有141,578名年龄在55至69岁之间的男性被随机分配至系统筛查组或常规护理组。超额死亡人数定义为前列腺癌(PC)患者的观察死亡人数与截至2006年12月31日的预期死亡人数之差。预期死亡人数源自所有研究参与者在PC诊断前的死亡率,并根据研究中心、研究组和研究参与情况进行调整。比较两个研究组的超额死亡率。结果 干预组的PC发病率为每1000人年9.25例,对照组为每1000人年5.49例,相对风险(RR)为1.69(95%置信区间[CI] 1.62 - 1.76)。PC患者中,干预组的超额死亡率为每1000人年0.29例,对照组为每1000人年0.37例;超额死亡率的RR为0.77(95% CI 0.55 - 1.08)。超额死亡率的绝对风险降低为每1000人年0.08例。研究的干预组和对照组之间的总体死亡率无显著差异:RR为0.99(95% CI 0.96 - 1.01)。结论 尽管超额死亡率的降低无统计学意义,但组间超额死亡率的降低与先前报道的疾病特异性死亡率降低20%一致。这一发现表明,ERSPC试验中PC死亡率的降低并非由于死亡原因判定中的偏差。