Suppr超能文献

跑步机运动与弗勒特疗法(Flutter®)对成年囊性纤维化患者呼吸气流及痰液性质的影响:一项随机对照交叉试验

Effects of treadmill exercise versus Flutter® on respiratory flow and sputum properties in adults with cystic fibrosis: a randomised, controlled, cross-over trial.

作者信息

Dwyer Tiffany J, Zainuldin Rahizan, Daviskas Evangelia, Bye Peter T P, Alison Jennifer A

机构信息

Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0360-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treadmill exercise and airway clearance with the Flutter® device have previously been shown to improve mucus clearance mechanisms in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) but have not been compared. It is therefore not known if treadmill exercise is an adequate form of airway clearance that could replace established airway clearance techniques, such as the Flutter®. The aim of this study was to evaluate respiratory flow, sputum properties and subjective responses of treadmill exercise and Flutter® therapy, compared to resting breathing (control).

METHODS

Twenty-four adults with mild to severe CF lung disease (FEV 28-86% predicted) completed a three-day randomised, controlled, cross-over study. Interventions consisted of 20 min of resting breathing (control), treadmill exercise at 60% of the participant's peak oxygen consumption and Flutter® therapy. Respiratory flow was measured during the interventions. Sputum properties (solids content and mechanical impedance) and subjective responses (ease of expectoration and sense of chest congestion) were measured before, immediately after the interventions and after 20 min of recovery.

RESULTS

Treadmill exercise and Flutter® resulted in similar significant increases in peak expiratory flow, but only Flutter® created an expiratory airflow bias (i.e. peak expiratory flow was at least 10% higher than peak inspiratory flow). Treadmill exercise and Flutter® therapy resulted in similar significant reductions in sputum mechanical impedance, but only treadmill exercise caused a transient increase in sputum hydration. Treadmill exercise improved ease of expectoration and Flutter® therapy improved subjective sense of chest congestion.

CONCLUSIONS

A single bout of treadmill exercise and Flutter® therapy were equally effective in augmenting mucus clearance mechanisms in adults with CF. Only longer term studies, however, will determine if exercise alone is an adequate form of airway clearance therapy that could replace other airway clearance techniques.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Registration number # ACTRN12609000168257 , Retrospectively registered (Date submitted to registry 26/2/2009, First participant enrolled 27/2/2009, Date registered 6/4/2009).

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,跑步机运动和使用弗勒特(Flutter®)装置进行气道清理可改善囊性纤维化(CF)患者的黏液清除机制,但尚未对二者进行比较。因此,尚不清楚跑步机运动是否是一种足以替代诸如弗勒特(Flutter®)等既定气道清理技术的气道清理方式。本研究的目的是评估与静息呼吸(对照)相比,跑步机运动和弗勒特(Flutter®)疗法对呼吸流量、痰液性质和主观反应的影响。

方法

24名患有轻至重度CF肺部疾病(预测FEV为28 - 86%)的成年人完成了一项为期三天的随机、对照、交叉研究。干预措施包括20分钟的静息呼吸(对照)、以参与者峰值耗氧量的60%进行跑步机运动以及弗勒特(Flutter®)疗法。在干预过程中测量呼吸流量。在干预前、干预后立即以及恢复20分钟后测量痰液性质(固体成分和机械阻抗)和主观反应(咳痰难易程度和胸部闷塞感)。

结果

跑步机运动和弗勒特(Flutter®)疗法均使呼气峰值流量显著增加且二者效果相似,但只有弗勒特(Flutter®)疗法产生了呼气气流偏向(即呼气峰值流量比吸气峰值流量至少高10%)。跑步机运动和弗勒特(Flutter®)疗法均使痰液机械阻抗显著降低且二者效果相似,但只有跑步机运动使痰液水合作用出现短暂增加。跑步机运动改善了咳痰的难易程度,弗勒特(Flutter®)疗法改善了胸部闷塞的主观感觉。

结论

单次跑步机运动和弗勒特(Flutter®)疗法在增强CF成年患者黏液清除机制方面同样有效。然而,只有长期研究才能确定单独运动是否是一种足以替代其他气道清理技术的气道清理治疗方式。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心,注册号# ACTRN12609000168257 ,回顾性注册(提交至注册中心的日期为2009年2月26日,第一名参与者入组日期为2009年2月27日,注册日期为2009年4月6日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bef/5225514/9992da385c6c/12890_2016_360_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验