Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chest. 2011 Apr;139(4):870-877. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1158. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
The physiologic mechanisms by which exercise may clear secretions in subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF) are unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare ventilation, respiratory flow, and sputum properties following treadmill and cycle exercise with resting breathing (referred to as "control").
In 14 adult subjects with CF, ventilation and respiratory flow were measured during 20 min of resting breathing, treadmill exercise, and cycle exercise in a 3-day crossover study. Treadmill and cycle exercise were performed at the work rate equivalent to 60% of the subject's peak oxygen uptake. Ease of expectoration and sputum properties (solids content and mechanical impedance) were measured before and immediately after the interventions and after 20-min recovery.
Ease of expectoration improved following exercise. Ventilation and respiratory flow were significantly higher during treadmill and cycle exercise compared with control. Sputum solids content did not change following treadmill or cycle exercise. There was a significantly greater decrease in sputum mechanical impedance following treadmill exercise compared with control, but no significant decrease in sputum mechanical impedance following cycle exercise compared with control.
The improvement in ease of expectoration following exercise may have been due to the higher ventilation and respiratory flow. The reductions in sputum mechanical impedance with treadmill exercise may have been due to the trunk oscillations associated with walking.
Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; No. 12605000422628; URL: www.anzctr.org.au.
运动清除囊性纤维化(CF)患者分泌物的生理机制尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较跑步机和自行车运动与休息呼吸(称为“对照”)后通气、呼吸流量和痰液特性。
在一项为期 3 天的交叉研究中,14 名成年 CF 患者在休息呼吸、跑步机运动和自行车运动期间测量了 20 分钟的通气和呼吸流量。跑步机和自行车运动的工作强度相当于受试者峰值摄氧量的 60%。在干预前和干预后立即以及 20 分钟恢复后测量咳痰的难易程度和痰液特性(固体含量和机械阻抗)。
运动后咳痰容易度提高。与对照相比,跑步机和自行车运动时通气和呼吸流量明显更高。跑步机或自行车运动后痰液固体含量没有变化。与对照相比,跑步机运动后痰液机械阻抗显著降低,但与对照相比,自行车运动后痰液机械阻抗无显著降低。
运动后咳痰容易度的改善可能归因于更高的通气和呼吸流量。跑步机运动后痰液机械阻抗的降低可能与行走时的躯干摆动有关。
澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心;编号 12605000422628;网址:www.anzctr.org.au。