Kaspar A, Pfister K, Nielsen M K, Silaghi C, Fink H, Scheuerle M C
Comparative Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Veterinary Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Present address: Parasite Consulting GmbH, Wendschatzstrasse 8, CH-3006, Berne, Switzerland.
BMC Vet Res. 2017 Jan 11;13(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0918-y.
Strongylus vulgaris has become a rare parasite in Germany during the past 50 years due to the practice of frequent prophylactic anthelmintic therapy. To date, the emerging development of resistance in Cyathostominae and Parascaris spp. to numerous equine anthelmintics has changed deworming management and the frequency of anthelmintic usage. In this regard, reliable detection of parasitic infections, especially of the highly pathogenic S. vulgaris is essential. In the current study, two diagnostic methods for the detection of infections with S. vulgaris were compared and information on the occurrence of this parasite in German horses was gained. For this purpose, faecal samples of 501 horses were screened for S. vulgaris with real-time PCR and an additional larval culture was performed in samples of 278 horses. A subset of 26 horses underwent multiple follow-up examinations with both methods in order to evaluate both the persistence of S. vulgaris infections and the reproducibility of each diagnostic method.
The real-time PCR revealed S. vulgaris-DNA in ten of 501 investigated equine samples (1.9%). The larval culture demonstrated larvae of S. vulgaris in three of the 278 samples (1.1%). A direct comparison of the two methods was possible in 321 samples including 43 follow-up examinations with the result of 11 S. vulgaris-positive samples by real-time PCR and 4 S. vulgaris-positive samples by larval culture. The McNemar's test (p-value = 0.016) revealed a significant difference and the kappa values (0.525) showed a moderate agreement between real-time PCR and larval culture.
The real-time PCR detected a significantly higher proportion of positives of S. vulgaris compared to larval culture and should thus be considered as a routine diagnostic method for the detection of S. vulgaris in equine samples.
在过去50年里,由于频繁进行预防性驱虫治疗,普通圆线虫在德国已成为一种罕见的寄生虫。迄今为止,杯状线虫属和副蛔虫属对多种马用驱虫药产生耐药性的新情况改变了驱虫管理和驱虫药的使用频率。在这方面,可靠地检测寄生虫感染,尤其是高致病性的普通圆线虫感染至关重要。在本研究中,比较了两种检测普通圆线虫感染的诊断方法,并获取了该寄生虫在德国马匹中的发生情况信息。为此,对501匹马的粪便样本进行了实时PCR筛查,以检测普通圆线虫,另外对278匹马的样本进行了幼虫培养。对26匹马的一个子集使用两种方法进行了多次随访检查,以评估普通圆线虫感染的持续性以及每种诊断方法的可重复性。
实时PCR在501份调查的马样本中的10份(1.9%)中检测到普通圆线虫DNA。幼虫培养在278份样本中的3份(1.1%)中发现了普通圆线虫幼虫。在321份样本(包括43次随访检查)中可以对两种方法进行直接比较,实时PCR检测出11份普通圆线虫阳性样本,幼虫培养检测出4份普通圆线虫阳性样本。McNemar检验(p值 = 0.016)显示存在显著差异,kappa值(0.525)表明实时PCR和幼虫培养之间存在中等程度的一致性。
与幼虫培养相比,实时PCR检测到的普通圆线虫阳性比例显著更高,因此应将其视为检测马样本中普通圆线虫的常规诊断方法。