Diekmann Irina, Blazejak Katrin, Krücken Jürgen, Strube Christina, von Samson-Himmelstjerna Georg
Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research (TZR), Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Equine Vet J. 2025 Mar;57(2):522-529. doi: 10.1111/evj.14134. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
Surveillance of Strongylus vulgaris and other Strongylus spp. in equids is important for targeted intervention in parasite control, requiring reliable routine diagnostic methods.
Comparing morphological examination and PCR analyses of larval cultures to identify Strongylus spp. species based on German diagnostic samples from 2018.
Method comparison.
During the routine diagnostic investigations, in total 712 strongyle-egg positive equine faecal samples were cultured. Third-stage larvae (L3) were morphologically differentiated. For molecular validation, samples were examined using S. vulgaris real-time PCR and Strongylus edentatus/Strongylus equinus/Strongylus asini high-resolution melting PCRs.
Based on 28S rRNA PCR, 594 samples positive for nematode DNA were included in the study. The inter-rater reliability to compare morphological and molecular species identification was fair for Strongylus spp. without species identification and for S. edentatus, slight for S. equinus and poor for S. vulgaris. The frequency based on morphological and molecular data in this study were for S. vulgaris 0% and 0.8%, respectively, for S. edentatus 0.3% and 1.5%, respectively, and for S. equinus 2.0% and 0.2%, respectively. Based on molecular analyses, one sample obtained from a domestic horse contained S. asini DNA, which was confirmed by sequencing.
For many samples, no or only incomplete data regarding clinical history, the exact geographical location and whether samples were obtained on individual or farm level, were available.
Results of morphological and molecular examination methods of strongyle L3 from equine samples can differ substantially. Further evaluation of these methods is required to provide reliable and cost-effective methods of screening equine parasites. Further studies using approaches suitable to detect S. asini are needed to evaluate its clinical and epidemiological relevance.
监测马属动物体内的普通圆线虫及其他圆线虫属物种对于寄生虫控制的靶向干预十分重要,这需要可靠的常规诊断方法。
基于2018年德国的诊断样本,比较幼虫培养物的形态学检查和PCR分析,以鉴定圆线虫属物种。
方法比较。
在常规诊断调查期间,共培养了712份马属动物粪便样本,这些样本的圆线虫卵呈阳性。对第三期幼虫(L3)进行形态学鉴别。为进行分子验证,使用普通圆线虫实时PCR以及无齿圆线虫/马圆线虫/驴圆线虫高分辨率熔解PCR对样本进行检测。
基于28S rRNA PCR,本研究纳入了594份线虫DNA呈阳性的样本。对于未进行物种鉴定的圆线虫属以及无齿圆线虫,形态学和分子物种鉴定结果之间的评分者间信度一般;对于马圆线虫,评分者间信度较低;对于普通圆线虫,评分者间信度较差。基于本研究中的形态学和分子数据,普通圆线虫的频率分别为0%和0.8%,无齿圆线虫分别为0.3%和1.5%,马圆线虫分别为2.0%和0.2%。基于分子分析,一份来自家养马的样本含有驴圆线虫DNA,测序结果证实了这一点。
对于许多样本,没有或只有关于临床病史、确切地理位置以及样本是在个体还是农场层面采集的不完整数据。
马属动物样本中圆线虫L3的形态学和分子检查方法结果可能存在显著差异。需要对这些方法进行进一步评估,以提供可靠且具有成本效益的马属动物寄生虫筛查方法。需要使用适合检测驴圆线虫的方法进行进一步研究,以评估其临床和流行病学相关性。