Suppr超能文献

小腿神经肌肉电刺激和间歇性气动压迫对大腿微循环的影响。

The effect of calf neuromuscular electrical stimulation and intermittent pneumatic compression on thigh microcirculation.

作者信息

Bahadori Shayan, Immins Tikki, Wainwright Thomas W

机构信息

Orthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth University, 6th Floor Executive Business Centre, 89 Holdenhurst Road, Bournemouth BH8 8EB, UK.

出版信息

Microvasc Res. 2017 May;111:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the effectiveness of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device and an intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) device on enhancing microcirculatory blood flow in the thigh of healthy individuals, when stimulation is carried out peripherally at the calf.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood microcirculation of ten healthy individuals was recorded using laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) technique. A region of interest (ROI) was marked on each participant thigh. The mean flux within the ROI was calculated at four states: rest, NMES device with visible muscle actuation (VMA), NMES device with no visible muscle actuation (NVMA) and IPC device.

RESULTS

Both NMES and IPC devices increased blood flow in the thigh when stimulation was carried out peripherally at the calf. The NMES device increased mean blood perfusion from baseline by 399.8% at the VMA state and 150.6% at the NVMA state, IPC device increased the mean blood perfusion by 117.3% from baseline.

CONCLUSION

The NMES device at VMA state increased microcirculation by more than a factor of 3 in contrast to the IPC device. Even at the NVMA state, the NMES device increased blood flow by 23% more than the IPC device. Given the association between increased microcirculation and reduced oedema, NMES may be a more effective modality than IPC at reducing oedema, therefore further research is needed to explore this.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)设备和间歇性气动压迫(IPC)设备在小腿外周进行刺激时,对增强健康个体大腿微循环血流的有效性。

材料与方法

使用激光散斑对比成像(LSCI)技术记录10名健康个体的血液微循环情况。在每位参与者的大腿上标记一个感兴趣区域(ROI)。在四种状态下计算ROI内的平均通量:静息状态、可见肌肉激活(VMA)的NMES设备、无可见肌肉激活(NVMA)的NMES设备和IPC设备。

结果

当在小腿外周进行刺激时,NMES和IPC设备均增加了大腿的血流量。NMES设备在VMA状态下使平均血液灌注较基线增加399.8%,在NVMA状态下增加150.6%,IPC设备使平均血液灌注较基线增加117.3%。

结论

与IPC设备相比,VMA状态下的NMES设备使微循环增加了3倍多。即使在NVMA状态下,NMES设备的血流量也比IPC设备增加了23%。鉴于微循环增加与水肿减轻之间的关联,NMES在减轻水肿方面可能比IPC更有效,因此需要进一步研究来探索这一点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验