From the Department of Medicine, UTSouthwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (M.S.L.); TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (R.P.G., C.T.R., B.M.S., A.E.C., S.A.M., E.M.A., E.B.); Department of Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland (H.H.); Oulu University Hospital, Finland (H.H.); Heart and Health Foundation of Turkey, Ankara (A.O.); Daiichi-Sankyo Pharma Development, Munich, Germany (H.L.); and Daiichi-Sankyo Pharma Development, Edison, NJ (M.F.M.).
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004267.
Whether the pattern of atrial fibrillation (AF) modifies the risk/benefit of anticoagulation is controversial. In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48), the factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolic events and significantly reduced bleeding and cardiovascular mortality. However, detailed analyses by AF pattern have not been reported.
The 21 105 patients were categorized as having paroxysmal (<7 days duration), persistent (≥7 days but <1 year), or permanent (≥1 year or failed cardioversion) AF patterns at randomization. Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated during the 2.8 years median follow-up and compared by AF pattern. The primary end point of stroke/systemic embolic event was lower in those patients with paroxysmal AF (1.49%/year), compared with persistent (1.83%/year; P-adj =0.015) and permanent AF (1.95%/year; P-adj =0.004). Overall, all-cause mortality also was lower with paroxysmal (3.0%/year) compared with persistent (4.4%/year; P-adj <0.001) and permanent AF (4.4%/year; P-adj <0.001). Annualized major bleeding rates were similar across AF patterns (2.86% versus 2.65% versus 2.73%). There was no effect modification by treatment assignment.
In ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, patients with paroxysmal AF suffered fewer thromboembolic events and deaths compared with those with persistent and permanent AF. The efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban as compared with warfarin was consistent across the 3 patterns of AF.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00781391.
心房颤动(AF)模式是否改变抗凝的风险/获益仍存在争议。在 ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 试验(房颤血栓形成溶栓治疗 48 小时新一代 Xa 因子抑制剂)中,Xa 因子抑制剂依度沙班在预防中风或全身性栓塞事件方面不劣于华法林,且显著减少出血和心血管死亡率。然而,尚未报道详细的房颤模式分析。
21105 名患者在随机分组时被分为阵发性(<7 天)、持续性(≥7 天但<1 年)或永久性(≥1 年或电复律失败)房颤模式。在 2.8 年的中位随访期间评估疗效和安全性,并按房颤模式进行比较。中风/全身性栓塞事件的主要终点在阵发性房颤患者中较低(1.49%/年),与持续性房颤(1.83%/年;P-调整=0.015)和永久性房颤(1.95%/年;P-调整=0.004)相比。总的来说,与持续性房颤(4.4%/年;P-调整<0.001)和永久性房颤(4.4%/年;P-调整<0.001)相比,阵发性房颤患者的全因死亡率也较低(3.0%/年)。房颤模式之间的年化大出血发生率相似(2.86%对 2.65%对 2.73%)。治疗分配没有改变作用。
在 ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 试验中,与持续性和永久性房颤相比,阵发性房颤患者发生血栓栓塞事件和死亡的风险较低。与华法林相比,依度沙班的疗效和安全性在 3 种房颤模式中一致。