Zhong Jinman, Zhao Weiwei, Ren Fang, Qi Shun, Wang Xifu, Lv Tianchu, Su Zhanliang, Yin Hong, Ren Jing, Huan Yi
Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago, USA.
Am J Transl Res. 2016 Dec 15;8(12):5601-5609. eCollection 2016.
The aim of the study was to investigate the value of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for diagnosing lymph nodes metastasis before treatment in gastric cancer. Eighty-two patients with proven gastric cancer underwent CT, morphological MRI (T2WI) and DWI examinations. Two radiologists independently assessed these images for the presence of lymph nodes involvement. Pathologic findings were considered as "gold standard". Independent samples -test was used for the comparisons of short diameters and ADC values between the positive lymph nodes and the negative lymph nodes. Diagnostic accuracy of these three imaging modalities was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC). The ADC value of the positive lymph nodes was (1.15 ± 0.01) × 10 mm/s, which was significantly lower than that of the negative lymph nodes (1.48 ± 0.01) × 10 mm/s ( = 18.70, < 0.0001). The short diameter of the positive lymph nodes (1.54 ± 0.38 cm) was significantly greater than that of the negative lymph nodes (0.95 ± 0.12 mm) ( = 19.03, < 0.001). The AUC for all imaging modalities combined (0.893) was significantly larger than that for each imaging modality alone ( < 0.05), and the AUC of DWI (0.797) was significantly larger than ( < 0.05) that of morphological MRI (0.733). There was no statistically significant difference between the AUCs of CT and morphological MRI ( = 0.462). In conclusion, CT, MRI and DWI combined present significantly higher accuracy than each imaging modality alone in the detection of lymph nodes involvement.
本研究旨在探讨计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)及弥散加权成像(DWI)在胃癌治疗前诊断淋巴结转移中的价值。82例确诊为胃癌的患者接受了CT、形态学MRI(T2WI)及DWI检查。两名放射科医生独立评估这些图像以判断是否存在淋巴结受累。病理结果被视为“金标准”。采用独立样本t检验比较阳性淋巴结与阴性淋巴结的短径及表观扩散系数(ADC)值。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)评估这三种成像方式的诊断准确性。阳性淋巴结的ADC值为(1.15±0.01)×10⁻³mm²/s,显著低于阴性淋巴结的(1.48±0.01)×10⁻³mm²/s(t = 18.70,P < 0.0001)。阳性淋巴结的短径(1.54±0.38 cm)显著大于阴性淋巴结的(0.95±0.12 mm)(t = 19.03,P < 0.001)。所有成像方式联合的AUC(0.893)显著大于每种成像方式单独的AUC(P < 0.05),且DWI的AUC(0.797)显著大于形态学MRI的(0.733)(P < 0.05)。CT与形态学MRI的AUC之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.462)。总之,在检测淋巴结受累方面,CT、MRI及DWI联合应用的准确性显著高于每种成像方式单独应用。